1981Journal of the Optical Society of AmericaRequires access

Validity of the Fresnel approximation in the near field

W. H. Southwell

Open publisher page 164 citations

Abstract

By direct numerical-integration comparisons, it is established that the Fresnel approximation for collimated propagation is quite good (within about 2% in amplitude and 0.02 rad in phase) in every case, including that with the limit of a high Fresnel number. Moreover, the Fresnel approximation begins to break down in phase for spherical-wave propagation for beams faster than about f/12. It has been discovered, however, that if one also invokes the paraxial approximation, that is, replaces the spherical wave by a quadratic phase front, then the Fresnel approximation becomes valid for expanding (or diverging) beams as well. This result is substantiated through the use of stationary-phase arguments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

By direct numerical-integration comparisons, it is established that the Fresnel approximation for collimated propagation is quite good (within about 2% in amplitude and 0.02 rad in phase) in every case, including that with the limit of a high Fresnel number. Moreover, the Fresnel approximation begins to break down in phase for spherical-wave propagation for beams faster than about f/12. It has been discovered, however, that if one also invokes the paraxial approximation, that is, replaces the spherical wave by a quadratic phase front, then the Fresnel approximation becomes valid for expanding (or diverging) beams as well. This result is substantiated through the use of stationary-phase arguments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 164 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

By direct numerical-integration comparisons, it is established that the Fresnel approximation for collimated propagation is quite good (within about 2% in amplitude and 0.02 rad in phase) in every case, including that with the limit of a high Fresnel number. Moreover, the Fresnel approximation begins to break down in phase for spherical-wave propagation for beams faster than about f/12. It has been discovered, however, that if one also invokes the paraxial approximation, that is, replaces the spherical wave by a quadratic phase front, then the Fresnel approximation becomes valid for expanding (or diverging) beams as well. This result is substantiated through the use of stationary-phase arguments.

Key concepts: Fresnel number, Paraxial approximation, Fresnel zone, Fresnel integral, Fresnel diffraction, Physics, Optics, Fresnel equations

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Validity of the Fresnel approximation in the near field — Research Paper | ScholarLens