2003•Public AdministrationRequires access

European governance and the transfer of ‘new’ environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) in the European Union

Andrew Jordan, Rüdiger K.W. Wurzel, Anthony R. Zito, Lars Brückner

Open publisher page 183 citations

Abstract

This article examines the use of ‘new’ environmental policy instruments (NEPIs), particularly market‐based instruments (for example, eco‐taxes) and voluntary agreements, in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the actor motivation behind the recent increase in the adoption of new and innovative instruments in EU (and member state) environmental policies while also taking account of the external international arena. The article assesses whether new ideas put forward by policy entrepreneurs, such as member governments, EU institutions, expert groups and non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), are the main motivation behind the EU adoption of NEPIs, or whether market and harmonization pressures are the main driving forces. It concentrates on eco‐taxes, voluntary agreements and eco‐labels, using the following three theoretical perspectives: (1) policy learning and transfer/ideational; (2) garbage can; and (3) institutional approaches.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines the use of ‘new’ environmental policy instruments (NEPIs), particularly market‐based instruments (for example, eco‐taxes) and voluntary agreements, in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the actor motivation behind the recent increase in the adoption of new and innovative instruments in EU (and member state) environmental policies while also taking account of the external international arena. The article assesses whether new ideas put forward by policy entrepreneurs, such as member governments, EU institutions, expert groups and non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), are the main motivation behind the EU adoption of NEPIs, or whether market and harmonization pressures are the main driving forces. It concentrates on eco‐taxes, voluntary agreements and eco‐labels, using the following three theoretical perspectives: (1) policy learning and transfer/ideational; (2) garbage can; and (3) institutional approaches.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 183 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines the use of ‘new’ environmental policy instruments (NEPIs), particularly market‐based instruments (for example, eco‐taxes) and voluntary agreements, in the European Union (EU). It focuses on the actor motivation behind the recent increase in the adoption of new and innovative instruments in EU (and member state) environmental policies while also taking account of the external international arena. The article assesses whether new ideas put forward by policy entrepreneurs, such as member governments, EU institutions, expert groups and non‐governmental organizations (NGOs), are the main motivation behind the EU adoption of NEPIs, or whether market and harmonization pressures are the main driving forces. It concentrates on eco‐taxes, voluntary agreements and eco‐labels, using the following three theoretical perspectives: (1) policy learning and transfer/ideational; (2) garbage can; and (3) institutional approaches.

Key concepts: Harmonization, European union, Corporate governance, Member state, Environmental policy, Business, Member states, Garbage

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
European governance and the transfer of ‘new’ environmental policy instruments (NEPIs) in the European Union — Research Paper | ScholarLens