1971American Journal of AnatomyRequires access

Atrioventricular node and purkinje fibers of the guinea pig heart

Sangsin Kim, Nobuhisa Baba

Open publisher page 30 citations

Abstract

Abstract The ultrastructure of the atrioventricular node and Purkinje fibers of the guinea pig heart was studied. The atrioventricular node consists of slender, irregularly shaped muscle cells which are arranged in a complex network with frequent interdigitation. Nodal cells contact with each other by means of many desmosomes (maculae adherentes) and rare intercalated discs that contain short nexal regions (gap junctions). The Purkinje fibers are much larger and show less cellular interdigitation than the fibers of the atrioventricular node. Desmosomes are infrequent but there are many intercalated discs with rather a long nexus between the Purkinje fibers. The T‐system is not present in the atrioventricular node or in the Purkinje fibers. The most pronounced morphological differences between the atrioventricular node and Purkinje fibers are the size of the cells and the mode of intercellular connection, which may be related to different conduction velocities in these two regions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract The ultrastructure of the atrioventricular node and Purkinje fibers of the guinea pig heart was studied. The atrioventricular node consists of slender, irregularly shaped muscle cells which are arranged in a complex network with frequent interdigitation. Nodal cells contact with each other by means of many desmosomes (maculae adherentes) and rare intercalated discs that contain short nexal regions (gap junctions). The Purkinje fibers are much larger and show less cellular interdigitation than the fibers of the atrioventricular node. Desmosomes are infrequent but there are many intercalated discs with rather a long nexus between the Purkinje fibers. The T‐system is not present in the atrioventricular node or in the Purkinje fibers. The most pronounced morphological differences between the atrioventricular node and Purkinje fibers are the size of the cells and the mode of intercellular connection, which may be related to different conduction velocities in these two regions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 30 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract The ultrastructure of the atrioventricular node and Purkinje fibers of the guinea pig heart was studied. The atrioventricular node consists of slender, irregularly shaped muscle cells which are arranged in a complex network with frequent interdigitation. Nodal cells contact with each other by means of many desmosomes (maculae adherentes) and rare intercalated discs that contain short nexal regions (gap junctions). The Purkinje fibers are much larger and show less cellular interdigitation than the fibers of the atrioventricular node. Desmosomes are infrequent but there are many intercalated discs with rather a long nexus between the Purkinje fibers. The T‐system is not present in the atrioventricular node or in the Purkinje fibers. The most pronounced morphological differences between the atrioventricular node and Purkinje fibers are the size of the cells and the mode of intercellular connection, which may be related to different conduction velocities in these two regions.

Key concepts: Purkinje fibers, Atrioventricular node, Anatomy, Ultrastructure, Electrical conduction system of the heart, Node (physics), Gap junction, Biology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Atrioventricular node and purkinje fibers of the guinea pig heart — Research Paper | ScholarLens