2013•Unpublished venueRequires access

Geomechanics Mechanisms in Microseismicity Generation Near Natural Fractures Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing

Yanhui Han, Jesse Hampton, G. Li, Norm R. Warpinski, Michael J. Mayerhofer

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Abstract Economic success producing oil/gas from low-permeability shale often relies on pre-existing natural fractures (NFs) to be activated or connected by hydraulic fracturing (HF) stimulation. In practice, the reactivated natural fracture network is often identified using the microseismicity (MS) monitored during the stimulation. However, the fundamental mechanisms of MS generation and focal mechanisms inferred from geophysical analysis near hydraulic fractures are not currently well understood (e.g., it is not clear whether the MS observed in the field can be mainly attributed to local shear slip along natural fractures when leakoff occurs and/or induced by stress changes as a result of HF propagation or fluid leakoff). The exact slippage area and amount of slip displacement generating the microseimic event are not well understood either, thus requiring a “bridge” between geomechanics and geophysics. To bridge this gap, a set of experiments will be performed in a geomechanics laboratory to observe whether, when, where, and how the acoustic emission (AE) events are generated under various scenarios. The experiments are designed under the guidance of fracture flow-discrete element method (DEM), coupling geomechanical simulations. In this paper, the reliability and accuracy of the fracture flow-DEM coupling approach is validated through solving a few fundamental problems and comparing the numerical simulation results with the corresponding analytical solutions. The coupling approach is then applied to simulate and optimize two fundamental laboratory experiments. The simulations indicate that, despite the difference in the magnitude, the local slip along natural fractures could be induced by both fluid leakoff and stress changes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Economic success producing oil/gas from low-permeability shale often relies on pre-existing natural fractures (NFs) to be activated or connected by hydraulic fracturing (HF) stimulation. In practice, the reactivated natural fracture network is often identified using the microseismicity (MS) monitored during the stimulation. However, the fundamental mechanisms of MS generation and focal mechanisms inferred from geophysical analysis near hydraulic fractures are not currently well understood (e.g., it is not clear whether the MS observed in the field can be mainly attributed to local shear slip along natural fractures when leakoff occurs and/or induced by stress changes as a result of HF propagation or fluid leakoff). The exact slippage area and amount of slip displacement generating the microseimic event are not well understood either, thus requiring a “bridge” between geomechanics and geophysics. To bridge this gap, a set of experiments will be performed in a geomechanics laboratory to observe whether, when, where, and how the acoustic emission (AE) events are generated under various scenarios. The experiments are designed under the guidance of fracture flow-discrete element method (DEM), coupling geomechanical simulations. In this paper, the reliability and accuracy of the fracture flow-DEM coupling approach is validated through solving a few fundamental problems and comparing the numerical simulation results with the corresponding analytical solutions. The coupling approach is then applied to simulate and optimize two fundamental laboratory experiments. The simulations indicate that, despite the difference in the magnitude, the local slip along natural fractures could be induced by both fluid leakoff and stress changes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Economic success producing oil/gas from low-permeability shale often relies on pre-existing natural fractures (NFs) to be activated or connected by hydraulic fracturing (HF) stimulation. In practice, the reactivated natural fracture network is often identified using the microseismicity (MS) monitored during the stimulation. However, the fundamental mechanisms of MS generation and focal mechanisms inferred from geophysical analysis near hydraulic fractures are not currently well understood (e.g., it is not clear whether the MS observed in the field can be mainly attributed to local shear slip along natural fractures when leakoff occurs and/or induced by stress changes as a result of HF propagation or fluid leakoff). The exact slippage area and amount of slip displacement generating the microseimic event are not well understood either, thus requiring a “bridge” between geomechanics and geophysics. To bridge this gap, a set of experiments will be performed in a geomechanics laboratory to observe whether, when, where, and how the acoustic emission (AE) events are generated under various scenarios. The experiments are designed under the guidance of fracture flow-discrete element method (DEM), coupling geomechanical simulations. In this paper, the reliability and accuracy of the fracture flow-DEM coupling approach is validated through solving a few fundamental problems and comparing the numerical simulation results with the corresponding analytical solutions. The coupling approach is then applied to simulate and optimize two fundamental laboratory experiments. The simulations indicate that, despite the difference in the magnitude, the local slip along natural fractures could be induced by both fluid leakoff and stress changes.

Key concepts: Geomechanics, Hydraulic fracturing, Geology, Slippage, Microseism, Permeability (electromagnetism), Slip (aerodynamics), Geotechnical engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Geomechanics Mechanisms in Microseismicity Generation Near Natural Fractures Induced by Hydraulic Fracturing — Research Paper | ScholarLens