1975•Agronomy JournalRequires access

Performance of Spring Sown Triticale, Oats, Barley, and Wheat1

Edward S. Oplinger, Vernon L. Youngs

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Triticale (X Triticosecale) has recently been promoted as a high protein livestock feed. In order to determine its suitability for this purpose we compared the yield, test weight, protein content and lodging of triticale with that of adapted cultivars of spring oats (Avena sativa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at four locations in each of 4 years in Wisconsin. Triticale cultivars averaged 16.9% protein concentration in the whole grain, while wheat, oats and barley cultivars averaged 15.5, 14.2 and 12.5% protein, respectively. However, wheat, oats, and barley produced higher grain yields and more protein on an area basis. Maximum protein yield was produced by Dal oats, a recently released high protein cultivar. The triticale cultivars were taller than the other species, but they had good standability up to maturity. Triticale was later in maturity, harder to thresh, and of considerably higher ergot content than the other spring species.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Triticale (X Triticosecale) has recently been promoted as a high protein livestock feed. In order to determine its suitability for this purpose we compared the yield, test weight, protein content and lodging of triticale with that of adapted cultivars of spring oats (Avena sativa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at four locations in each of 4 years in Wisconsin. Triticale cultivars averaged 16.9% protein concentration in the whole grain, while wheat, oats and barley cultivars averaged 15.5, 14.2 and 12.5% protein, respectively. However, wheat, oats, and barley produced higher grain yields and more protein on an area basis. Maximum protein yield was produced by Dal oats, a recently released high protein cultivar. The triticale cultivars were taller than the other species, but they had good standability up to maturity. Triticale was later in maturity, harder to thresh, and of considerably higher ergot content than the other spring species.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Triticale (X Triticosecale) has recently been promoted as a high protein livestock feed. In order to determine its suitability for this purpose we compared the yield, test weight, protein content and lodging of triticale with that of adapted cultivars of spring oats (Avena sativa L.), barley (Hordeum vulgare L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at four locations in each of 4 years in Wisconsin. Triticale cultivars averaged 16.9% protein concentration in the whole grain, while wheat, oats and barley cultivars averaged 15.5, 14.2 and 12.5% protein, respectively. However, wheat, oats, and barley produced higher grain yields and more protein on an area basis. Maximum protein yield was produced by Dal oats, a recently released high protein cultivar. The triticale cultivars were taller than the other species, but they had good standability up to maturity. Triticale was later in maturity, harder to thresh, and of considerably higher ergot content than the other spring species.

Key concepts: Triticale, Avena, Agronomy, Cultivar, Hordeum vulgare, Biology, Test weight, Poaceae

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Performance of Spring Sown Triticale, Oats, Barley, and Wheat1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens