2005The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Targetless schwa revisited

Edward Flemming

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

It has been suggested that schwa vowels in English lack vowel quality targets, that is, they are realized as interpolations between the preceding and following segmental contexts or are the result of separating two consonantal constriction gestures, without an inherent vocalic gesture. Tests of this hypothesis have produced mixed results. The present study revisits the question of schwa targets based on acoustic analysis of schwa vowels in a wider range of segmental and morphological contexts. The main conclusions are: (i) It is important to distinguish stem-final reduced vowels (as in ‘‘pandA’’) from other schwa vowels (e.g., ‘‘About,’’ ‘‘bEgin’’). The former clearly have vowel quality targets they are generally mid central vowels whereas the latter are much more contextually variable. (ii) The variable schwa vowels have a target, but this target is not a particular vowel quality, it is to indicate the presence of a vowel. This is achieved through a variety of means, including duration and realization of a local amplitude peak, but is consistent with substantial variation in vowel quality, particularly F2.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

It has been suggested that schwa vowels in English lack vowel quality targets, that is, they are realized as interpolations between the preceding and following segmental contexts or are the result of separating two consonantal constriction gestures, without an inherent vocalic gesture. Tests of this hypothesis have produced mixed results. The present study revisits the question of schwa targets based on acoustic analysis of schwa vowels in a wider range of segmental and morphological contexts. The main conclusions are: (i) It is important to distinguish stem-final reduced vowels (as in ‘‘pandA’’) from other schwa vowels (e.g., ‘‘About,’’ ‘‘bEgin’’). The former clearly have vowel quality targets they are generally mid central vowels whereas the latter are much more contextually variable. (ii) The variable schwa vowels have a target, but this target is not a particular vowel quality, it is to indicate the presence of a vowel. This is achieved through a variety of means, including duration and realization of a local amplitude peak, but is consistent with substantial variation in vowel quality, particularly F2.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

It has been suggested that schwa vowels in English lack vowel quality targets, that is, they are realized as interpolations between the preceding and following segmental contexts or are the result of separating two consonantal constriction gestures, without an inherent vocalic gesture. Tests of this hypothesis have produced mixed results. The present study revisits the question of schwa targets based on acoustic analysis of schwa vowels in a wider range of segmental and morphological contexts. The main conclusions are: (i) It is important to distinguish stem-final reduced vowels (as in ‘‘pandA’’) from other schwa vowels (e.g., ‘‘About,’’ ‘‘bEgin’’). The former clearly have vowel quality targets they are generally mid central vowels whereas the latter are much more contextually variable. (ii) The variable schwa vowels have a target, but this target is not a particular vowel quality, it is to indicate the presence of a vowel. This is achieved through a variety of means, including duration and realization of a local amplitude peak, but is consistent with substantial variation in vowel quality, particularly F2.

Key concepts: Schwa, Vowel, Mid vowel, Realization (probability), Duration (music), Quality (philosophy), Variation (astronomy), Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Targetless schwa revisited — Research Paper | ScholarLens