Transition of Railroad Bridge Approaches
Dingqing Li, David Davis
Abstract
Dingqing Li, David Davis
Abstract
Years of investigations have shown that very stiff track structures on railroad bridges and abrupt stiffness changes between the bridge and the approach are two factors that can accelerate the performance problems associated with concrete tie track, ballasted deck concrete bridges. These problems include rapid track geometry degradation and cracking of concrete ties. For the four sites investigated, the resulting geometry degradation (or differential settlement between bridge and approach) came from the ballast and subballast layers, with additional contribution from the underlying soil layers (subgrade). Remedies intended to strengthen the approach subgrade may not be effective, if they are not designed to produce consistent and acceptable track stiffness between the bridge and the approach. The study presented in this paper was conducted on a number of railroad bridges and their approaches on a western railroad in the United States. The objective of the study was to investigate the factors that can cause or accelerate performance problems associated with bridge approach or track transition, and to identify and evaluate appropriate mitigation methods.
OpenAlex reports 199 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Years of investigations have shown that very stiff track structures on railroad bridges and abrupt stiffness changes between the bridge and the approach are two factors that can accelerate the performance problems associated with concrete tie track, ballasted deck concrete bridges. These problems include rapid track geometry degradation and cracking of concrete ties. For the four sites investigated, the resulting geometry degradation (or differential settlement between bridge and approach) came from the ballast and subballast layers, with additional contribution from the underlying soil layers (subgrade). Remedies intended to strengthen the approach subgrade may not be effective, if they are not designed to produce consistent and acceptable track stiffness between the bridge and the approach. The study presented in this paper was conducted on a number of railroad bridges and their approaches on a western railroad in the United States. The objective of the study was to investigate the factors that can cause or accelerate performance problems associated with bridge approach or track transition, and to identify and evaluate appropriate mitigation methods.
Key concepts: Subgrade, Ballast, Bridge (graph theory), Track (disk drive), Stiffness, Settlement (finance), Structural engineering, Track geometry