1994Japanese Journal of Cancer ResearchOpen access

Different Modes of Cell‐killing Action between DNA Topoisomerase I and II Inhibitors Revealed by Kinetic Analysis

Makoto Inaba, Junko Mitsuhashi, Shouzou Kawada, Hirofumi Nakano

Open full text 14 citations

Abstract

We compared the modes of cell-killing by DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors. The effects of camptothecin (CPT), KT-6528 and UCE6 upon colony formation by inhibiting DNA topoisomerase I, and of etoposide (VP-16), teniposide, amsacrine and UCT4-A as inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II were analyzed based upon a kinetic method that distinguishes between cell cycle phase-specific and -nonspecific agents. Human colorectal cancer WiDr cells were exposed to several concentrations of each agent for various periods and 90%-inhibitory concentrations (IC90) at each time were determined by means of a clonogenic assay. When exposure times and corresponding IC90s were plotted on a log-log scale, all inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II gave curves including a linear portion with a slope of -1, which is characteristic of cell cycle phase-nonspecific agents. In contrast, the curves for all inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase I had a much steeper slope than -1, which is typical of cell cycle phase-specific agents. In agreement with this finding, the cells were remarkably accumulated in the G2-M phase when exposed to VP-16, but in late S-phase when exposed to CPT as determined by a flow cytometric assay. These results indicated that the two classes of agents kill cells in a quite different manner although they are inhibitors of similar enzymes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We compared the modes of cell-killing by DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors. The effects of camptothecin (CPT), KT-6528 and UCE6 upon colony formation by inhibiting DNA topoisomerase I, and of etoposide (VP-16), teniposide, amsacrine and UCT4-A as inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II were analyzed based upon a kinetic method that distinguishes between cell cycle phase-specific and -nonspecific agents. Human colorectal cancer WiDr cells were exposed to several concentrations of each agent for various periods and 90%-inhibitory concentrations (IC90) at each time were determined by means of a clonogenic assay. When exposure times and corresponding IC90s were plotted on a log-log scale, all inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II gave curves including a linear portion with a slope of -1, which is characteristic of cell cycle phase-nonspecific agents. In contrast, the curves for all inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase I had a much steeper slope than -1, which is typical of cell cycle phase-specific agents. In agreement with this finding, the cells were remarkably accumulated in the G2-M phase when exposed to VP-16, but in late S-phase when exposed to CPT as determined by a flow cytometric assay. These results indicated that the two classes of agents kill cells in a quite different manner although they are inhibitors of similar enzymes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We compared the modes of cell-killing by DNA topoisomerase I and II inhibitors. The effects of camptothecin (CPT), KT-6528 and UCE6 upon colony formation by inhibiting DNA topoisomerase I, and of etoposide (VP-16), teniposide, amsacrine and UCT4-A as inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II were analyzed based upon a kinetic method that distinguishes between cell cycle phase-specific and -nonspecific agents. Human colorectal cancer WiDr cells were exposed to several concentrations of each agent for various periods and 90%-inhibitory concentrations (IC90) at each time were determined by means of a clonogenic assay. When exposure times and corresponding IC90s were plotted on a log-log scale, all inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase II gave curves including a linear portion with a slope of -1, which is characteristic of cell cycle phase-nonspecific agents. In contrast, the curves for all inhibitors of DNA topoisomerase I had a much steeper slope than -1, which is typical of cell cycle phase-specific agents. In agreement with this finding, the cells were remarkably accumulated in the G2-M phase when exposed to VP-16, but in late S-phase when exposed to CPT as determined by a flow cytometric assay. These results indicated that the two classes of agents kill cells in a quite different manner although they are inhibitors of similar enzymes.

Key concepts: Topoisomerase, Teniposide, Amsacrine, Etoposide, Camptothecin, DNA, Cell cycle, Topoisomerase inhibitor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Different Modes of Cell‐killing Action between DNA Topoisomerase I and II Inhibitors Revealed by Kinetic Analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens