1979Soil Science Society of America JournalRequires access

Nitrous Oxide Emission During Denitrification in a Flooded Field

O. T. Denmead, J. R. Freney, J. R. Simpson

Open publisher page 64 citations

Abstract

Abstract Little field information is available on the amounts of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) released from soils during denitrification, or the proportion of the denitrification loss attributable to N 2 O production. The paper reports studies of N 2 O evolution and the simultaneous disappearance of nitrate (NO 3 ) in a flooded rice field which initially contained 4 g NO 3 ‐N m −2 in the top 0.08 m of soil. Measurements were made continuously for 18 days after the field was flooded. Nitrous oxide emission was calculated from the rate of increase of N 2 O in air circulating in a closed loop between a chamber installed in the field and an infrared gas analyzer. Emission rates as small as 1.8 ng N m −2 sec −1 could be measured. Nitrate disappearance was measured by chemical analysis of water samples. Nitrous oxide emission showed a diurnal cycle in phase with water temperature. Between the second and nineteenth day of flooding, 2.7 g NO 3 ‐N m −2 disappeared from the water and 0.038 g N 2 O‐N m −2 were produced, only 1.4% of the apparent N loss. In a supplementary, small‐bay experiment in which sodium nitrate and glycerol were added to the water, N 2 O production accounted for only 0.8% of the NO 3 disappearance. Even allowing for NO 3 removal through other mechanisms, the production of N 2 O in both experiments was very much less than the 7% commonly assumed for denitrification in current models of the global N 2 O budget.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract Little field information is available on the amounts of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) released from soils during denitrification, or the proportion of the denitrification loss attributable to N 2 O production. The paper reports studies of N 2 O evolution and the simultaneous disappearance of nitrate (NO 3 ) in a flooded rice field which initially contained 4 g NO 3 ‐N m −2 in the top 0.08 m of soil. Measurements were made continuously for 18 days after the field was flooded. Nitrous oxide emission was calculated from the rate of increase of N 2 O in air circulating in a closed loop between a chamber installed in the field and an infrared gas analyzer. Emission rates as small as 1.8 ng N m −2 sec −1 could be measured. Nitrate disappearance was measured by chemical analysis of water samples. Nitrous oxide emission showed a diurnal cycle in phase with water temperature. Between the second and nineteenth day of flooding, 2.7 g NO 3 ‐N m −2 disappeared from the water and 0.038 g N 2 O‐N m −2 were produced, only 1.4% of the apparent N loss. In a supplementary, small‐bay experiment in which sodium nitrate and glycerol were added to the water, N 2 O production accounted for only 0.8% of the NO 3 disappearance. Even allowing for NO 3 removal through other mechanisms, the production of N 2 O in both experiments was very much less than the 7% commonly assumed for denitrification in current models of the global N 2 O budget.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 64 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract Little field information is available on the amounts of nitrous oxide (N 2 O) released from soils during denitrification, or the proportion of the denitrification loss attributable to N 2 O production. The paper reports studies of N 2 O evolution and the simultaneous disappearance of nitrate (NO 3 ) in a flooded rice field which initially contained 4 g NO 3 ‐N m −2 in the top 0.08 m of soil. Measurements were made continuously for 18 days after the field was flooded. Nitrous oxide emission was calculated from the rate of increase of N 2 O in air circulating in a closed loop between a chamber installed in the field and an infrared gas analyzer. Emission rates as small as 1.8 ng N m −2 sec −1 could be measured. Nitrate disappearance was measured by chemical analysis of water samples. Nitrous oxide emission showed a diurnal cycle in phase with water temperature. Between the second and nineteenth day of flooding, 2.7 g NO 3 ‐N m −2 disappeared from the water and 0.038 g N 2 O‐N m −2 were produced, only 1.4% of the apparent N loss. In a supplementary, small‐bay experiment in which sodium nitrate and glycerol were added to the water, N 2 O production accounted for only 0.8% of the NO 3 disappearance. Even allowing for NO 3 removal through other mechanisms, the production of N 2 O in both experiments was very much less than the 7% commonly assumed for denitrification in current models of the global N 2 O budget.

Key concepts: Nitrous oxide, Denitrification, Nitrate, Chemistry, Environmental chemistry, Soil water, Nitrogen, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Nitrous Oxide Emission During Denitrification in a Flooded Field — Research Paper | ScholarLens