1995Journal of Social IssuesRequires access

When is “Obedience” Obedience? Conceptual and Historical Commentary

Neil Lutsky

Open publisher page 57 citations

Abstract

This article reassesses the role of obedience to authority in the Milgram experiment and in the Holocaust. I argue that the term “obedience” can be used to both describe and explain the behavior of subjects in Milgram's experiment, and that a failure to distinguish the two uses conceptually has led to an inflated sense of the extent to which Milgram's experiment demonstrates underlying obedience to authority. The article also reviews empirical evidence and alternative analyses to show that when authority influences behavior in the experiment, it may do so for reasons other than the subjects' felt obligation to obey. Finally, I suggest that contemporary history presents a more complex and problematic view of the Holocaust than that implied by social psychology's application of obedience to authority.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article reassesses the role of obedience to authority in the Milgram experiment and in the Holocaust. I argue that the term “obedience” can be used to both describe and explain the behavior of subjects in Milgram's experiment, and that a failure to distinguish the two uses conceptually has led to an inflated sense of the extent to which Milgram's experiment demonstrates underlying obedience to authority. The article also reviews empirical evidence and alternative analyses to show that when authority influences behavior in the experiment, it may do so for reasons other than the subjects' felt obligation to obey. Finally, I suggest that contemporary history presents a more complex and problematic view of the Holocaust than that implied by social psychology's application of obedience to authority.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article reassesses the role of obedience to authority in the Milgram experiment and in the Holocaust. I argue that the term “obedience” can be used to both describe and explain the behavior of subjects in Milgram's experiment, and that a failure to distinguish the two uses conceptually has led to an inflated sense of the extent to which Milgram's experiment demonstrates underlying obedience to authority. The article also reviews empirical evidence and alternative analyses to show that when authority influences behavior in the experiment, it may do so for reasons other than the subjects' felt obligation to obey. Finally, I suggest that contemporary history presents a more complex and problematic view of the Holocaust than that implied by social psychology's application of obedience to authority.

Key concepts: Milgram experiment, Obedience, Obligation, Social psychology, The Holocaust, Psychology, Conformity, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
When is “Obedience” Obedience? Conceptual and Historical Commentary — Research Paper | ScholarLens