From Answer Set Logic Programming to Circumscription via Logic of GK
Author information unavailable
Abstract
Author information unavailable
Abstract
We first provide a mapping from Pearce’s equilibrium logic and Ferraris’s general logic programs to Lin and Shoham’s logic of knowledge and justified assumptions, a nonmonotonic modal logic that has been shown to include as special cases both Reiter’s default logic in the propositional case and Moore’s autoepistemic logic. From this mapping, we obtain a mapping from general logic programs to circumscription, both in the propositional and first-order case. Furthermore, we show that this mapping can be used to check the strong equivalence between two propositional logic programs in classical logic. 1
OpenAlex reports 32 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We first provide a mapping from Pearce’s equilibrium logic and Ferraris’s general logic programs to Lin and Shoham’s logic of knowledge and justified assumptions, a nonmonotonic modal logic that has been shown to include as special cases both Reiter’s default logic in the propositional case and Moore’s autoepistemic logic. From this mapping, we obtain a mapping from general logic programs to circumscription, both in the propositional and first-order case. Furthermore, we show that this mapping can be used to check the strong equivalence between two propositional logic programs in classical logic. 1
Key concepts: Autoepistemic logic, Circumscription, Zeroth-order logic, Default logic, Intermediate logic, Stable model semantics, Well-formed formula, Many-valued logic