1999•Geographical AnalysisRequires access

Measuring Space‐Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures

Harvey J. Miller

Open publisher page 408 citations

Abstract

Accessibility is a fundamental but often neglected concept in transportation analysis and planning. Three complementary views of accessibility have evolved in the literature. The first is the constraints‐oriented approach, best implemented by Hägerstrand's space‐time prisms. The second perspective follows a spatial interaction framework and derives “attraction‐accessibility measures” that compare destinations' attractiveness with the travel costs required. A third approach measures the benefit provided to individuals by the transportation land‐use system. This paper reconciles the three complementary approaches by deriving space‐time accessibility and benefit measures that are consistent with the rigorous Weibull axiomatic framework for accessibility measures. This research also develops computational procedures for calculating these measures within network structures. This provides realistic accessibility measures that reflect the locations, distances, and travel velocities allowed by an urban transportation network. Since their computational burdens are reasonable, they can be applied at the urban scale using a GIS.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Accessibility is a fundamental but often neglected concept in transportation analysis and planning. Three complementary views of accessibility have evolved in the literature. The first is the constraints‐oriented approach, best implemented by Hägerstrand's space‐time prisms. The second perspective follows a spatial interaction framework and derives “attraction‐accessibility measures” that compare destinations' attractiveness with the travel costs required. A third approach measures the benefit provided to individuals by the transportation land‐use system. This paper reconciles the three complementary approaches by deriving space‐time accessibility and benefit measures that are consistent with the rigorous Weibull axiomatic framework for accessibility measures. This research also develops computational procedures for calculating these measures within network structures. This provides realistic accessibility measures that reflect the locations, distances, and travel velocities allowed by an urban transportation network. Since their computational burdens are reasonable, they can be applied at the urban scale using a GIS.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 408 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Accessibility is a fundamental but often neglected concept in transportation analysis and planning. Three complementary views of accessibility have evolved in the literature. The first is the constraints‐oriented approach, best implemented by Hägerstrand's space‐time prisms. The second perspective follows a spatial interaction framework and derives “attraction‐accessibility measures” that compare destinations' attractiveness with the travel costs required. A third approach measures the benefit provided to individuals by the transportation land‐use system. This paper reconciles the three complementary approaches by deriving space‐time accessibility and benefit measures that are consistent with the rigorous Weibull axiomatic framework for accessibility measures. This research also develops computational procedures for calculating these measures within network structures. This provides realistic accessibility measures that reflect the locations, distances, and travel velocities allowed by an urban transportation network. Since their computational burdens are reasonable, they can be applied at the urban scale using a GIS.

Key concepts: Computer science, Space (punctuation), Perspective (graphical), Attractiveness, Axiom, Scale (ratio), Transport engineering, Operations research

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Measuring Space‐Time Accessibility Benefits within Transportation Networks: Basic Theory and Computational Procedures — Research Paper | ScholarLens