1986Practical DiabetesRequires access

The “insulin pen”: Comparison with multiple injection treatment with syringe

Knut Dahl‐Jørgensen, K. F. Hanssen, R Mosand, Leiv Sandvik

Open publisher page 20 citations

Abstract

Abstract A new insulin “fountain‐pen” injection device (NovoPenTM) was tested in 10 insulin‐dependent diabetic patients, aged 21–34 years, who had used multiple injection therapy with syringe‐injections for more than one year previously. The patients had strict pre‐study blood glucose control; HbA1 8.8% ± 1.9. They used NovoPen for 6–9 months (mean 8 months). HbA1 increased slightly during pen treatment to 9.3% ± 1.8 (p < 0.01), probably due to insufficient insulin delivery. All but one patient experienced technical problems with the devices. They all wanted to continue using it, because of the simplicity of injections and the increased daily life flexibility. Since the patients have no direct control over the amount of insulin injected, caution is needed when introducing insulin pen injections.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract A new insulin “fountain‐pen” injection device (NovoPenTM) was tested in 10 insulin‐dependent diabetic patients, aged 21–34 years, who had used multiple injection therapy with syringe‐injections for more than one year previously. The patients had strict pre‐study blood glucose control; HbA1 8.8% ± 1.9. They used NovoPen for 6–9 months (mean 8 months). HbA1 increased slightly during pen treatment to 9.3% ± 1.8 (p < 0.01), probably due to insufficient insulin delivery. All but one patient experienced technical problems with the devices. They all wanted to continue using it, because of the simplicity of injections and the increased daily life flexibility. Since the patients have no direct control over the amount of insulin injected, caution is needed when introducing insulin pen injections.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 20 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract A new insulin “fountain‐pen” injection device (NovoPenTM) was tested in 10 insulin‐dependent diabetic patients, aged 21–34 years, who had used multiple injection therapy with syringe‐injections for more than one year previously. The patients had strict pre‐study blood glucose control; HbA1 8.8% ± 1.9. They used NovoPen for 6–9 months (mean 8 months). HbA1 increased slightly during pen treatment to 9.3% ± 1.8 (p < 0.01), probably due to insufficient insulin delivery. All but one patient experienced technical problems with the devices. They all wanted to continue using it, because of the simplicity of injections and the increased daily life flexibility. Since the patients have no direct control over the amount of insulin injected, caution is needed when introducing insulin pen injections.

Key concepts: Syringe, Medicine, Insulin pen, Insulin, Insulin delivery, Diabetes mellitus, Surgery, Anesthesia

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The “insulin pen”: Comparison with multiple injection treatment with syringe — Research Paper | ScholarLens