1985Antimicrobial Agents and ChemotherapyOpen access

Efficacy of amikacin and ceftazidime in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Arnold S. Bayer, Derek D. Norman, K S Kim

Open full text 43 citations

Abstract

The in vivo efficacies of amikacin, ceftazidime, and their combination were evaluated in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eighty catheterized rabbits were infected with a P. aeruginosa strain susceptible to both amikacin and ceftazidime and then received no therapy (controls), amikacin (15 mg/kg per day), ceftazidime (100 mg/kg per day), or amikacin-ceftazidime. Amikacin-ceftazidime significantly lowered vegetation titers of P. aeruginosa at day 7 of therapy versus other regimens (P less than 0.0005). However, by day 14 of therapy, vegetation titers in animals receiving amikacin or ceftazidime regimens or both were not different from those of untreated controls; this was associated with in vivo development of amikacin resistance in most infected vegetations (79%), a phenomenon not seen at day 7 of therapy. Amikacin resistance was unstable in vivo, being undetectable in vegetations examined 5 days after treatment with amikacin had been completed. In contrast, ceftazidime resistance (first noted at day 7 of therapy in 12% of vegetations) persisted after termination of treatment with this agent. These in vivo observations on loss of amikacin resistance and persistence of ceftazidime resistance were mirrored during in vitro passage studies of amikacin- or ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa strains isolated from cardiac vegetations. Amikacin resistance was no longer detectable by passage 5 in antibiotic-free media; however, ceftazidime resistance was stable despite 15 such passages. In vivo development of aminoglycoside-beta-lactam resistances was associated with poor bacteriologic efficacy in this model.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The in vivo efficacies of amikacin, ceftazidime, and their combination were evaluated in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eighty catheterized rabbits were infected with a P. aeruginosa strain susceptible to both amikacin and ceftazidime and then received no therapy (controls), amikacin (15 mg/kg per day), ceftazidime (100 mg/kg per day), or amikacin-ceftazidime. Amikacin-ceftazidime significantly lowered vegetation titers of P. aeruginosa at day 7 of therapy versus other regimens (P less than 0.0005). However, by day 14 of therapy, vegetation titers in animals receiving amikacin or ceftazidime regimens or both were not different from those of untreated controls; this was associated with in vivo development of amikacin resistance in most infected vegetations (79%), a phenomenon not seen at day 7 of therapy. Amikacin resistance was unstable in vivo, being undetectable in vegetations examined 5 days after treatment with amikacin had been completed. In contrast, ceftazidime resistance (first noted at day 7 of therapy in 12% of vegetations) persisted after termination of treatment with this agent. These in vivo observations on loss of amikacin resistance and persistence of ceftazidime resistance were mirrored during in vitro passage studies of amikacin- or ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa strains isolated from cardiac vegetations. Amikacin resistance was no longer detectable by passage 5 in antibiotic-free media; however, ceftazidime resistance was stable despite 15 such passages. In vivo development of aminoglycoside-beta-lactam resistances was associated with poor bacteriologic efficacy in this model.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 43 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The in vivo efficacies of amikacin, ceftazidime, and their combination were evaluated in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Eighty catheterized rabbits were infected with a P. aeruginosa strain susceptible to both amikacin and ceftazidime and then received no therapy (controls), amikacin (15 mg/kg per day), ceftazidime (100 mg/kg per day), or amikacin-ceftazidime. Amikacin-ceftazidime significantly lowered vegetation titers of P. aeruginosa at day 7 of therapy versus other regimens (P less than 0.0005). However, by day 14 of therapy, vegetation titers in animals receiving amikacin or ceftazidime regimens or both were not different from those of untreated controls; this was associated with in vivo development of amikacin resistance in most infected vegetations (79%), a phenomenon not seen at day 7 of therapy. Amikacin resistance was unstable in vivo, being undetectable in vegetations examined 5 days after treatment with amikacin had been completed. In contrast, ceftazidime resistance (first noted at day 7 of therapy in 12% of vegetations) persisted after termination of treatment with this agent. These in vivo observations on loss of amikacin resistance and persistence of ceftazidime resistance were mirrored during in vitro passage studies of amikacin- or ceftazidime-resistant P. aeruginosa strains isolated from cardiac vegetations. Amikacin resistance was no longer detectable by passage 5 in antibiotic-free media; however, ceftazidime resistance was stable despite 15 such passages. In vivo development of aminoglycoside-beta-lactam resistances was associated with poor bacteriologic efficacy in this model.

Key concepts: Amikacin, Ceftazidime, Aminoglycoside, Medicine, Microbiology, Antibiotics, In vivo, Antibacterial agent

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Efficacy of amikacin and ceftazidime in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa — Research Paper | ScholarLens