2014West Indian Medical JournalOpen access

Diagnostic Value of p16 Methylation for Malignant Pleural Effusions: A Meta-analysis

M Li, S-J Guo, Y-C Shen, L-Q Jia, D-D Li, Chaomin Wan, F-Q Wen

Open full text 1 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the overall diagnostic performance of the p16 methylation for diagnosing malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: All published literature in English and Chinese were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled by using random-effects model or fixed-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was used to evaluate the overall diagnostic value. RESULTS: Six studies were included with a total of 378 cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and DOR of p16 methylation in the diagnosis of MPE were 0.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35, 0.48], 0.97 [95% CI 0.93, 0.99], 9.57 [95% CI 4.53, 20.20], 0.61 [95% CI 0.45, 0.82] and 19.82 [95% CI 8.35, 47.04], respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.864. CONCLUSION: Pleural p16 methylation test plays a useful role in the diagnosis of MPE.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the overall diagnostic performance of the p16 methylation for diagnosing malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: All published literature in English and Chinese were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled by using random-effects model or fixed-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was used to evaluate the overall diagnostic value. RESULTS: Six studies were included with a total of 378 cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and DOR of p16 methylation in the diagnosis of MPE were 0.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35, 0.48], 0.97 [95% CI 0.93, 0.99], 9.57 [95% CI 4.53, 20.20], 0.61 [95% CI 0.45, 0.82] and 19.82 [95% CI 8.35, 47.04], respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.864. CONCLUSION: Pleural p16 methylation test plays a useful role in the diagnosis of MPE.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the overall diagnostic performance of the p16 methylation for diagnosing malignant pleural effusion (MPE). METHODS: All published literature in English and Chinese were reviewed. Sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) were pooled by using random-effects model or fixed-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve was used to evaluate the overall diagnostic value. RESULTS: Six studies were included with a total of 378 cases. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and DOR of p16 methylation in the diagnosis of MPE were 0.41 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35, 0.48], 0.97 [95% CI 0.93, 0.99], 9.57 [95% CI 4.53, 20.20], 0.61 [95% CI 0.45, 0.82] and 19.82 [95% CI 8.35, 47.04], respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.864. CONCLUSION: Pleural p16 methylation test plays a useful role in the diagnosis of MPE.

Key concepts: Diagnostic odds ratio, Medicine, Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing, Confidence interval, Receiver operating characteristic, Odds ratio, Internal medicine, Meta-analysis

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic Value of p16 Methylation for Malignant Pleural Effusions: A Meta-analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens