More on finding a single number to indicate overall performance of a benchmark suite
Lizy K. John
Abstract
Lizy K. John
Abstract
The topic of finding a single number to summarize overall performance over a benchmark suite is continuing to be a difficult issue 14 years after Smith’s paper [1]. While significant insight into the problem has been provided by Smith [1], Hennessey and Patterson [2], Cragon [3], etc, the research community still seems to be unclear on the correct mean to use for different performance metrics. How should metrics obtained from individual benchmarks be aggregated to present a summary of the performance over the entire suite? What are valid central tendency measures over the whole benchmark suite for speedup, CPI, IPC, MIPS, MFLOPS, cache miss rates, cache hit rates, branch misprediction rates, etc? Arithmetic mean has been touted to be appropriate for
OpenAlex reports 52 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The topic of finding a single number to summarize overall performance over a benchmark suite is continuing to be a difficult issue 14 years after Smith’s paper [1]. While significant insight into the problem has been provided by Smith [1], Hennessey and Patterson [2], Cragon [3], etc, the research community still seems to be unclear on the correct mean to use for different performance metrics. How should metrics obtained from individual benchmarks be aggregated to present a summary of the performance over the entire suite? What are valid central tendency measures over the whole benchmark suite for speedup, CPI, IPC, MIPS, MFLOPS, cache miss rates, cache hit rates, branch misprediction rates, etc? Arithmetic mean has been touted to be appropriate for
Key concepts: Suite, Citation, Benchmark (surveying), Computer science, World Wide Web, History, Geography, Archaeology