1984Journal of Antimicrobial ChemotherapyRequires access

Variations in susceptibility to latamoxef (moxalactam) and cefoxitin within the Bacteroides fragilis group

A. Eley, David Greenwood

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

Conventional agar dilution MIC titrations, anaerobic turbidimetric monitoring and viable counting were used to investigate the response to latamoxef (moxalactam) and cefoxitin of four well characterized species within the Bacteroides fragilis group. MIC results indicated that Bact. fragilis and Bact. vulgatus were more susceptible to both antibiotics than were Bact. ovatus and Bact. thetaiotaomicron and that latamoxef was more active than cefoxitin. Continuous turbidimetric monitoring with parallel viable counting confirmed the greater susceptibility of Bact. fragilis and Bact. vulgatus, but also suggested that the differential in activity between latamoxef and cefoxitin was less than MIC titrations had indicated. Moreover, against the more resistant Bact. ovatus and Bact. thetaiotaomicron strains, cefoxitin actually appeared more active than latamoxef in bactericidal and bacteriolytic terms. The interpretation of these results is discussed in the light of the morphological response of the bacteria to the two antibiotics. Because species within the Bact. fragilis group appear to differ considerably in their beta-lactam antibiotic susceptibility there is a need for laboratories to test the antibiotic susceptibility of these organisms or to identify them presumptively to the species level if treatment with beta-lactam agents is contemplated.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Conventional agar dilution MIC titrations, anaerobic turbidimetric monitoring and viable counting were used to investigate the response to latamoxef (moxalactam) and cefoxitin of four well characterized species within the Bacteroides fragilis group. MIC results indicated that Bact. fragilis and Bact. vulgatus were more susceptible to both antibiotics than were Bact. ovatus and Bact. thetaiotaomicron and that latamoxef was more active than cefoxitin. Continuous turbidimetric monitoring with parallel viable counting confirmed the greater susceptibility of Bact. fragilis and Bact. vulgatus, but also suggested that the differential in activity between latamoxef and cefoxitin was less than MIC titrations had indicated. Moreover, against the more resistant Bact. ovatus and Bact. thetaiotaomicron strains, cefoxitin actually appeared more active than latamoxef in bactericidal and bacteriolytic terms. The interpretation of these results is discussed in the light of the morphological response of the bacteria to the two antibiotics. Because species within the Bact. fragilis group appear to differ considerably in their beta-lactam antibiotic susceptibility there is a need for laboratories to test the antibiotic susceptibility of these organisms or to identify them presumptively to the species level if treatment with beta-lactam agents is contemplated.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Conventional agar dilution MIC titrations, anaerobic turbidimetric monitoring and viable counting were used to investigate the response to latamoxef (moxalactam) and cefoxitin of four well characterized species within the Bacteroides fragilis group. MIC results indicated that Bact. fragilis and Bact. vulgatus were more susceptible to both antibiotics than were Bact. ovatus and Bact. thetaiotaomicron and that latamoxef was more active than cefoxitin. Continuous turbidimetric monitoring with parallel viable counting confirmed the greater susceptibility of Bact. fragilis and Bact. vulgatus, but also suggested that the differential in activity between latamoxef and cefoxitin was less than MIC titrations had indicated. Moreover, against the more resistant Bact. ovatus and Bact. thetaiotaomicron strains, cefoxitin actually appeared more active than latamoxef in bactericidal and bacteriolytic terms. The interpretation of these results is discussed in the light of the morphological response of the bacteria to the two antibiotics. Because species within the Bact. fragilis group appear to differ considerably in their beta-lactam antibiotic susceptibility there is a need for laboratories to test the antibiotic susceptibility of these organisms or to identify them presumptively to the species level if treatment with beta-lactam agents is contemplated.

Key concepts: Bacteroides fragilis, Latamoxef, Moxalactam, Cefoxitin, Microbiology, Antibiotics, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Agar dilution

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Variations in susceptibility to latamoxef (moxalactam) and cefoxitin within the Bacteroides fragilis group — Research Paper | ScholarLens