2009Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseRequires access

Disintegrating The Metabolic Cost Of Walking: Propulsion, Leg Swing, And Lateral Stability Across Speed

Jamie L. Bartlett, Rodger Kram

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Three of the major factors contributing to the net metabolic cost of walking include performing work to restore and redirect the center of mass velocity during step-to-step transitions, swinging the limbs, and maintaining lateral stability. PURPOSE: To determine if the proportions of the net cost of walking attributable to each of these factors are different at slow, normal, and fast walking speeds. METHODS: Using three different external assistive devices, we aided walking during slow (0.75 m/s), normal (1.25 m/s), and fast (1.75 m/s) treadmill speeds. These devices use pulling forces (forward propulsion, leg swing, lateral stability) that have previously been shown to reduce metabolic cost at normal walking speeds. RESULTS: The average gross metabolic rates at the slow, medium, and fast walking speeds were 3.21, 4.65, and 5.74 W/kg. Average standing metabolic rate was 1.64 W/kg. Propulsive assist alone decreased net (standing-gross) metabolic rate during slow, normal, and fast walking speeds (21.5%, 44.3%, and 40.7%, respectively) compared with unassisted walking (P<0.001). Leg swing assist, in combination with the aiding horizontal force, further decreased net metabolic rate for slow, normal, and fast walking speeds (11.2%, 9.8%, and 11.8%, respectively) compared with unassisted walking (P<0.001). The lateral stability device alone decreased net metabolic rate for slow, normal, and fast walking speeds (5.2%, 4.5%, and 1.9%, respectively) compared with unassisted walking (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our external assistive devices decreased net metabolic cost at slow, normal, and fast walking speeds. However, the proportional cost of the three major factors was not the same across walking speeds. The metabolic costs of each of the three factors were greater at faster speeds. The change in the relative proportional costs may be due to sub-optimal inverted-pendulum mechanics during nonpreferred walking speeds changes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Three of the major factors contributing to the net metabolic cost of walking include performing work to restore and redirect the center of mass velocity during step-to-step transitions, swinging the limbs, and maintaining lateral stability. PURPOSE: To determine if the proportions of the net cost of walking attributable to each of these factors are different at slow, normal, and fast walking speeds. METHODS: Using three different external assistive devices, we aided walking during slow (0.75 m/s), normal (1.25 m/s), and fast (1.75 m/s) treadmill speeds. These devices use pulling forces (forward propulsion, leg swing, lateral stability) that have previously been shown to reduce metabolic cost at normal walking speeds. RESULTS: The average gross metabolic rates at the slow, medium, and fast walking speeds were 3.21, 4.65, and 5.74 W/kg. Average standing metabolic rate was 1.64 W/kg. Propulsive assist alone decreased net (standing-gross) metabolic rate during slow, normal, and fast walking speeds (21.5%, 44.3%, and 40.7%, respectively) compared with unassisted walking (P<0.001). Leg swing assist, in combination with the aiding horizontal force, further decreased net metabolic rate for slow, normal, and fast walking speeds (11.2%, 9.8%, and 11.8%, respectively) compared with unassisted walking (P<0.001). The lateral stability device alone decreased net metabolic rate for slow, normal, and fast walking speeds (5.2%, 4.5%, and 1.9%, respectively) compared with unassisted walking (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our external assistive devices decreased net metabolic cost at slow, normal, and fast walking speeds. However, the proportional cost of the three major factors was not the same across walking speeds. The metabolic costs of each of the three factors were greater at faster speeds. The change in the relative proportional costs may be due to sub-optimal inverted-pendulum mechanics during nonpreferred walking speeds changes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Three of the major factors contributing to the net metabolic cost of walking include performing work to restore and redirect the center of mass velocity during step-to-step transitions, swinging the limbs, and maintaining lateral stability. PURPOSE: To determine if the proportions of the net cost of walking attributable to each of these factors are different at slow, normal, and fast walking speeds. METHODS: Using three different external assistive devices, we aided walking during slow (0.75 m/s), normal (1.25 m/s), and fast (1.75 m/s) treadmill speeds. These devices use pulling forces (forward propulsion, leg swing, lateral stability) that have previously been shown to reduce metabolic cost at normal walking speeds. RESULTS: The average gross metabolic rates at the slow, medium, and fast walking speeds were 3.21, 4.65, and 5.74 W/kg. Average standing metabolic rate was 1.64 W/kg. Propulsive assist alone decreased net (standing-gross) metabolic rate during slow, normal, and fast walking speeds (21.5%, 44.3%, and 40.7%, respectively) compared with unassisted walking (P<0.001). Leg swing assist, in combination with the aiding horizontal force, further decreased net metabolic rate for slow, normal, and fast walking speeds (11.2%, 9.8%, and 11.8%, respectively) compared with unassisted walking (P<0.001). The lateral stability device alone decreased net metabolic rate for slow, normal, and fast walking speeds (5.2%, 4.5%, and 1.9%, respectively) compared with unassisted walking (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our external assistive devices decreased net metabolic cost at slow, normal, and fast walking speeds. However, the proportional cost of the three major factors was not the same across walking speeds. The metabolic costs of each of the three factors were greater at faster speeds. The change in the relative proportional costs may be due to sub-optimal inverted-pendulum mechanics during nonpreferred walking speeds changes.

Key concepts: Power walking, Preferred walking speed, Swing, Metabolic cost, Treadmill, Work (physics), Metabolic rate, Propulsion

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Disintegrating The Metabolic Cost Of Walking: Propulsion, Leg Swing, And Lateral Stability Across Speed — Research Paper | ScholarLens