2013Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological SocietyRequires access

Retinal nerve fiber layer versus optic nerve head evaluation in the diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients

AmalM Elbendary, Tharwat Mokbel, HossamT El Sharkawy, WaelM El Desouky

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the role of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) versus optic disc parameters in the diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucoma suspect using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).Patients and methodsForty-five normal, 51 glaucoma suspect, and 54 glaucomatous eyes were examined. Complete ophthalmic examination, white-on-white perimetry, and SD-OCT were performed for all patients. RNFL thickness of quadrants and clock hours and optic disc parameters were recorded. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were used to assess the performance of OCT.ResultsRNFL thickness and optic head parameters were used discriminate the three groups for all comparisons. Inferior, average, and superior RNFL thickness were the best parameters that discriminated normal from glaucoma (AUC: 0.96-0.99), suspect from glaucoma (AUC: 0.84-0.91), and normal from suspect (AUC: 0.71-85). Rim area and vertical cup/disc ratio were the best parameters that discriminated normal from glaucoma (0.87-0.90), suspect from glaucoma (AUC: 0.82-0.83), and normal from suspect (0.76).ConclusionThe ability of SD-OCT to differentiate between normal and glaucoma suspect eyes from glaucomatous eyes is better for RNFL thickness than optic nerve head parameters. The ability of both RNFL thickness and optic disc parameters is less in differentiating normal from glaucoma suspect eyes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PurposeTo evaluate the role of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) versus optic disc parameters in the diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucoma suspect using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).Patients and methodsForty-five normal, 51 glaucoma suspect, and 54 glaucomatous eyes were examined. Complete ophthalmic examination, white-on-white perimetry, and SD-OCT were performed for all patients. RNFL thickness of quadrants and clock hours and optic disc parameters were recorded. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were used to assess the performance of OCT.ResultsRNFL thickness and optic head parameters were used discriminate the three groups for all comparisons. Inferior, average, and superior RNFL thickness were the best parameters that discriminated normal from glaucoma (AUC: 0.96-0.99), suspect from glaucoma (AUC: 0.84-0.91), and normal from suspect (AUC: 0.71-85). Rim area and vertical cup/disc ratio were the best parameters that discriminated normal from glaucoma (0.87-0.90), suspect from glaucoma (AUC: 0.82-0.83), and normal from suspect (0.76).ConclusionThe ability of SD-OCT to differentiate between normal and glaucoma suspect eyes from glaucomatous eyes is better for RNFL thickness than optic nerve head parameters. The ability of both RNFL thickness and optic disc parameters is less in differentiating normal from glaucoma suspect eyes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the role of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) versus optic disc parameters in the diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucoma suspect using spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).Patients and methodsForty-five normal, 51 glaucoma suspect, and 54 glaucomatous eyes were examined. Complete ophthalmic examination, white-on-white perimetry, and SD-OCT were performed for all patients. RNFL thickness of quadrants and clock hours and optic disc parameters were recorded. Area under receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were used to assess the performance of OCT.ResultsRNFL thickness and optic head parameters were used discriminate the three groups for all comparisons. Inferior, average, and superior RNFL thickness were the best parameters that discriminated normal from glaucoma (AUC: 0.96-0.99), suspect from glaucoma (AUC: 0.84-0.91), and normal from suspect (AUC: 0.71-85). Rim area and vertical cup/disc ratio were the best parameters that discriminated normal from glaucoma (0.87-0.90), suspect from glaucoma (AUC: 0.82-0.83), and normal from suspect (0.76).ConclusionThe ability of SD-OCT to differentiate between normal and glaucoma suspect eyes from glaucomatous eyes is better for RNFL thickness than optic nerve head parameters. The ability of both RNFL thickness and optic disc parameters is less in differentiating normal from glaucoma suspect eyes.

Key concepts: Glaucoma, Nerve fiber layer, Medicine, Ophthalmology, Optic nerve, Optic disc, Optic cup (embryology), Optic disk

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Retinal nerve fiber layer versus optic nerve head evaluation in the diagnosis of glaucoma and glaucoma suspect patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens