DEMONSTRATION OF PHOTOPERIODIC ECOTYPES IN LIRIODENDRON AND QUERCUS
O. Vaartaja
Abstract
O. Vaartaja
Abstract
Seedlings of Liriodendron tulipifera responded very sensitively to daylength treatments in growth chambers. A certain daylength (6-hour night) inhibited northern but not southern seedlings. The same was true with seedlings of Quercus macrocarpa but the inhibition occurred under very short days (12-hour night) and the responses were smaller. In this species the onset of dormancy was controlled more strongly by the endogenous growth rhythm. The different photoperiodic responses appear to be an adaptation mechanism in these as well as in other species studied earlier. The responses could conceivably function for reliable timing in the alternation of growing and dormant stages.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Seedlings of Liriodendron tulipifera responded very sensitively to daylength treatments in growth chambers. A certain daylength (6-hour night) inhibited northern but not southern seedlings. The same was true with seedlings of Quercus macrocarpa but the inhibition occurred under very short days (12-hour night) and the responses were smaller. In this species the onset of dormancy was controlled more strongly by the endogenous growth rhythm. The different photoperiodic responses appear to be an adaptation mechanism in these as well as in other species studied earlier. The responses could conceivably function for reliable timing in the alternation of growing and dormant stages.
Key concepts: Ecotype, Biology, Dormancy, Botany, photoperiodism, Adaptation (eye), Rhythm, Horticulture