2006Muscle & NerveOpen access

Electrophysiological differences in seropositive and seronegative Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome

Shin J. Oh, Yuki Hatanaka, Gwen C. Claussen, Emanuele Sher

Open full text 57 citations

Abstract

In order to determine whether there is any difference between voltage-gated calcium-channel antibody (VGCC-Ab)-positive and -negative groups in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), we compared the clinical and electrophysiological features between 13 patients with VGCC-Ab and 6 VGCC-Ab-negative patients. No obvious difference was observed in the various clinical features or findings on single-fiber electromyography between seropositive and seronegative cases. In seropositive cases, the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude was lower but the increment on post-exercise facilitation (PEF) and high-rate stimulation (HRS) was significantly higher than in the seronegative group, indicating that the repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) test in the seropositive group is more typical of LEMS and more severe. A 100% increment as the diagnostic criterion in the routine RNS test was satisfied in all seropositive cases but in only three seronegative cases, whereas a 60% increment as the diagnostic criterion was found in all seronegative cases. The classic triad (low CMAP amplitude, decrement at low rate of stimulation, and increment at PEF or HRS) of RNS is rare, adding to the difficulty in diagnosing LEMS in the seronegative group, and making a 60% increment criterion more critical for the diagnosis of this disorder.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In order to determine whether there is any difference between voltage-gated calcium-channel antibody (VGCC-Ab)-positive and -negative groups in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), we compared the clinical and electrophysiological features between 13 patients with VGCC-Ab and 6 VGCC-Ab-negative patients. No obvious difference was observed in the various clinical features or findings on single-fiber electromyography between seropositive and seronegative cases. In seropositive cases, the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude was lower but the increment on post-exercise facilitation (PEF) and high-rate stimulation (HRS) was significantly higher than in the seronegative group, indicating that the repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) test in the seropositive group is more typical of LEMS and more severe. A 100% increment as the diagnostic criterion in the routine RNS test was satisfied in all seropositive cases but in only three seronegative cases, whereas a 60% increment as the diagnostic criterion was found in all seronegative cases. The classic triad (low CMAP amplitude, decrement at low rate of stimulation, and increment at PEF or HRS) of RNS is rare, adding to the difficulty in diagnosing LEMS in the seronegative group, and making a 60% increment criterion more critical for the diagnosis of this disorder.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 57 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In order to determine whether there is any difference between voltage-gated calcium-channel antibody (VGCC-Ab)-positive and -negative groups in Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS), we compared the clinical and electrophysiological features between 13 patients with VGCC-Ab and 6 VGCC-Ab-negative patients. No obvious difference was observed in the various clinical features or findings on single-fiber electromyography between seropositive and seronegative cases. In seropositive cases, the compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude was lower but the increment on post-exercise facilitation (PEF) and high-rate stimulation (HRS) was significantly higher than in the seronegative group, indicating that the repetitive nerve stimulation (RNS) test in the seropositive group is more typical of LEMS and more severe. A 100% increment as the diagnostic criterion in the routine RNS test was satisfied in all seropositive cases but in only three seronegative cases, whereas a 60% increment as the diagnostic criterion was found in all seronegative cases. The classic triad (low CMAP amplitude, decrement at low rate of stimulation, and increment at PEF or HRS) of RNS is rare, adding to the difficulty in diagnosing LEMS in the seronegative group, and making a 60% increment criterion more critical for the diagnosis of this disorder.

Key concepts: Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome, Repetitive nerve stimulation, Compound muscle action potential, Medicine, Electrophysiology, Stimulation, Myasthenia gravis, Electromyography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Electrophysiological differences in seropositive and seronegative Lambert–Eaton myasthenic syndrome — Research Paper | ScholarLens