1980American Industrial Hygiene Association JournalRequires access

Three instruments for assessment of WBGT and a comparison with WGT (Botsball)

B. ONKAPAM, Leander A. Stroschein, R F Goldman

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Environmental heat stress, expressed as the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT), was measured outdoors using three different instruments: a) the conventional shaded dry-bulb, 15.2-cm black globe and naturally convected wet bulb thermometers, b) a minaturized thermometer kit, and c) a commercial WBGT instrument using a thermistor sensors. The WBGT values were compared with the Wet Globe Temperature (WGT) measured with a Botsball. Measurements were made visually on the instruments at regular intervals and an automated data collection system also was used to obtain data from thermocouples attached to the instruments. Statisticallly significant differences in WBGT readings were found among the instruments; however, the difference for a given environment usually was less than 0.5 degrees C. Readings taken by visual observations resulted in WBGT values which differed by less than 0.3 degrees C from those calculated from the automated data collection system. By using an equation derived for the Botsball, WBGT = 1.044 WGT - 0.187 (in degrees C), it is possible to convert the Botsball thermometer dial to indicate the conventional WBGT for outdoor environments, thus making it a simple instrument for assessing environmental heat stress at the work site.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Environmental heat stress, expressed as the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT), was measured outdoors using three different instruments: a) the conventional shaded dry-bulb, 15.2-cm black globe and naturally convected wet bulb thermometers, b) a minaturized thermometer kit, and c) a commercial WBGT instrument using a thermistor sensors. The WBGT values were compared with the Wet Globe Temperature (WGT) measured with a Botsball. Measurements were made visually on the instruments at regular intervals and an automated data collection system also was used to obtain data from thermocouples attached to the instruments. Statisticallly significant differences in WBGT readings were found among the instruments; however, the difference for a given environment usually was less than 0.5 degrees C. Readings taken by visual observations resulted in WBGT values which differed by less than 0.3 degrees C from those calculated from the automated data collection system. By using an equation derived for the Botsball, WBGT = 1.044 WGT - 0.187 (in degrees C), it is possible to convert the Botsball thermometer dial to indicate the conventional WBGT for outdoor environments, thus making it a simple instrument for assessing environmental heat stress at the work site.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Environmental heat stress, expressed as the Wet Bulb Globe Temperature (WBGT), was measured outdoors using three different instruments: a) the conventional shaded dry-bulb, 15.2-cm black globe and naturally convected wet bulb thermometers, b) a minaturized thermometer kit, and c) a commercial WBGT instrument using a thermistor sensors. The WBGT values were compared with the Wet Globe Temperature (WGT) measured with a Botsball. Measurements were made visually on the instruments at regular intervals and an automated data collection system also was used to obtain data from thermocouples attached to the instruments. Statisticallly significant differences in WBGT readings were found among the instruments; however, the difference for a given environment usually was less than 0.5 degrees C. Readings taken by visual observations resulted in WBGT values which differed by less than 0.3 degrees C from those calculated from the automated data collection system. By using an equation derived for the Botsball, WBGT = 1.044 WGT - 0.187 (in degrees C), it is possible to convert the Botsball thermometer dial to indicate the conventional WBGT for outdoor environments, thus making it a simple instrument for assessing environmental heat stress at the work site.

Key concepts: Environmental science, Engineering, Forensic engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Three instruments for assessment of WBGT and a comparison with WGT (Botsball) — Research Paper | ScholarLens