Incidence and possible reasons for discordant results between positive FDP and negative D-dimer latex assays in clinical specimens
Kyung Soon Song, Young Ah Kim, Hyun‐Kyung Kim, Quehn Park
Abstract
Kyung Soon Song, Young Ah Kim, Hyun‐Kyung Kim, Quehn Park
Abstract
In general, FDP and D-dimer values have a correlation in clinical conditions associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation(DIC) or coagulation activation. However, there are some patients with discordant results who demonstrate elevated FDP and negative D-dimer results by latex agglutination assays. The incidence and possible reasons for the discordance between FDP and D-dimer results were investigated through simultaneous measurements (n = 763) from clinical patients with suspected DIC or coagulation activation. 24.8% (189/763) of samples with elevated FDP were negative for D-dimer assays by the latex agglutination method. Further detailed analysis on randomly-selected discordant samples (n = 41) revealed that the most common reason for the discordance was the lower sensitivity of the semiquantitative latex agglutination method for D-dimer, compared with quantitative enzyme or other latex immunoassay. The other contributing factors to the discordance were accelerated fibrinogenolysis without secondary fibrinolysis, elevated soluble fibrin monomer and rheumatoid factor.
OpenAlex reports 17 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In general, FDP and D-dimer values have a correlation in clinical conditions associated with disseminated intravascular coagulation(DIC) or coagulation activation. However, there are some patients with discordant results who demonstrate elevated FDP and negative D-dimer results by latex agglutination assays. The incidence and possible reasons for the discordance between FDP and D-dimer results were investigated through simultaneous measurements (n = 763) from clinical patients with suspected DIC or coagulation activation. 24.8% (189/763) of samples with elevated FDP were negative for D-dimer assays by the latex agglutination method. Further detailed analysis on randomly-selected discordant samples (n = 41) revealed that the most common reason for the discordance was the lower sensitivity of the semiquantitative latex agglutination method for D-dimer, compared with quantitative enzyme or other latex immunoassay. The other contributing factors to the discordance were accelerated fibrinogenolysis without secondary fibrinolysis, elevated soluble fibrin monomer and rheumatoid factor.
Key concepts: Latex fixation test, D-dimer, Fibrinolysis, Medicine, Agglutination (biology), Fibrin, Incidence (geometry), Coagulation