2011StrokeOpen access

Effects of Posture on Right-to-Left Shunt Detection by Contrast Transcranial Doppler

Sherwin J. U. Agustin, Maricar P. Yumul, Angelito Jonas L. Kalaw, Boon Choon Teo, Johnny Eng, Ziqun Phua, Rajinder Singh, Robert Gan, Narayanaswamy Venketasubramanian

Open full text 11 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is controversy about the optimal patient position for the detection of right-to-left shunt (RLS). The study was performed to investigate which patient position best detects RLS during contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients with ischemic stroke or TIA referred to our Noninvasive Cerebrovascular Laboratory for suspected paradoxical embolism. The standard protocol for RLS detection recommended by the International Consensus Criteria was followed. Each patient was examined at rest and after Valsalva maneuver in 4 positions: supine, right lateral decubitus, right lateral leaning, and upright sitting, in random order. RLS was graded 0 (no microbubbles [mB] detected), 1 (1-10 mB), 2 (>10 mB but no curtain), and 3 (curtain, shower of mB). Blood pressure, heart rate, and neurological symptoms were monitored. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17. RESULTS: RLS was detected in at least 1 position in 89 of 240 patients (37.1%; 95% CI, 33.1%-43.3%). The detection of at least 1 mB with normal breathing was lowest in supine position and highest in right lateral decubitus. With Valsalva maneuver, this was highest in upright sitting (20.4% versus 8.3%; P<0.0002). If mB were undetected on upright sitting position, then they may still be detected in other positions. Changes in the position of the body and the injection of agitated saline were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: RLS is best detected in the upright sitting position with Valsalva maneuver. If negative, then other positions may be used. Validation of our findings by other centers may be helpful.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is controversy about the optimal patient position for the detection of right-to-left shunt (RLS). The study was performed to investigate which patient position best detects RLS during contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients with ischemic stroke or TIA referred to our Noninvasive Cerebrovascular Laboratory for suspected paradoxical embolism. The standard protocol for RLS detection recommended by the International Consensus Criteria was followed. Each patient was examined at rest and after Valsalva maneuver in 4 positions: supine, right lateral decubitus, right lateral leaning, and upright sitting, in random order. RLS was graded 0 (no microbubbles [mB] detected), 1 (1-10 mB), 2 (>10 mB but no curtain), and 3 (curtain, shower of mB). Blood pressure, heart rate, and neurological symptoms were monitored. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17. RESULTS: RLS was detected in at least 1 position in 89 of 240 patients (37.1%; 95% CI, 33.1%-43.3%). The detection of at least 1 mB with normal breathing was lowest in supine position and highest in right lateral decubitus. With Valsalva maneuver, this was highest in upright sitting (20.4% versus 8.3%; P<0.0002). If mB were undetected on upright sitting position, then they may still be detected in other positions. Changes in the position of the body and the injection of agitated saline were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: RLS is best detected in the upright sitting position with Valsalva maneuver. If negative, then other positions may be used. Validation of our findings by other centers may be helpful.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is controversy about the optimal patient position for the detection of right-to-left shunt (RLS). The study was performed to investigate which patient position best detects RLS during contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated consecutive patients with ischemic stroke or TIA referred to our Noninvasive Cerebrovascular Laboratory for suspected paradoxical embolism. The standard protocol for RLS detection recommended by the International Consensus Criteria was followed. Each patient was examined at rest and after Valsalva maneuver in 4 positions: supine, right lateral decubitus, right lateral leaning, and upright sitting, in random order. RLS was graded 0 (no microbubbles [mB] detected), 1 (1-10 mB), 2 (>10 mB but no curtain), and 3 (curtain, shower of mB). Blood pressure, heart rate, and neurological symptoms were monitored. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 17. RESULTS: RLS was detected in at least 1 position in 89 of 240 patients (37.1%; 95% CI, 33.1%-43.3%). The detection of at least 1 mB with normal breathing was lowest in supine position and highest in right lateral decubitus. With Valsalva maneuver, this was highest in upright sitting (20.4% versus 8.3%; P<0.0002). If mB were undetected on upright sitting position, then they may still be detected in other positions. Changes in the position of the body and the injection of agitated saline were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: RLS is best detected in the upright sitting position with Valsalva maneuver. If negative, then other positions may be used. Validation of our findings by other centers may be helpful.

Key concepts: Valsalva maneuver, Medicine, Supine position, Sitting, Right-to-left shunt, Transcranial Doppler, Paradoxical embolism, Ultrasound

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Posture on Right-to-Left Shunt Detection by Contrast Transcranial Doppler — Research Paper | ScholarLens