Sacralization, secularization and religious fundamentalism
John Dadosky
Abstract
John Dadosky
Abstract
This paper seeks to understand religious fundamentalism and extremism by viewing it in a broader context in terms of a provocative fourfold distinction made by Canadian philosopher and theologian Bernard Lonergan: a sacralization to be dropped, a secularization to be welcomed, a secularization to be resisted and a sacralization to be fostered. Such distinctions shed light on the concerns of religious fundamentalisms and the dangers that the extreme aspects of these pose. Moreover, such distinctions reveal hope in the long-term from the ongoing inter-religious engagement leading to a context beyond religious fundamentalism and extremism.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper seeks to understand religious fundamentalism and extremism by viewing it in a broader context in terms of a provocative fourfold distinction made by Canadian philosopher and theologian Bernard Lonergan: a sacralization to be dropped, a secularization to be welcomed, a secularization to be resisted and a sacralization to be fostered. Such distinctions shed light on the concerns of religious fundamentalisms and the dangers that the extreme aspects of these pose. Moreover, such distinctions reveal hope in the long-term from the ongoing inter-religious engagement leading to a context beyond religious fundamentalism and extremism.
Key concepts: Fundamentalism, Secularization, Context (archaeology), Religious life, Religious studies, Sociology, Environmental ethics, Philosophy