ScholarLens Back to search
1956•PLANT PHYSIOLOGYOpen access

Floral Initiation in Cestrum nocturnum, A Long-Short Day Plant. II. A 24-Hour Versus a 16-Hour Photoperiod for Long Day Induction.

Roy M. Sachs

Open full text 5 citations

Abstract

Roy M. Sachs; Floral Initiation in Cestrum nocturnum, A Long-Short Day Plant. II. A 24-Hour Versus a 16-Hour Photoperiod for Long Day Induction. 1, Plant Physio

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Roy M. Sachs; Floral Initiation in Cestrum nocturnum, A Long-Short Day Plant. II. A 24-Hour Versus a 16-Hour Photoperiod for Long Day Induction. 1, Plant Physio

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Roy M. Sachs; Floral Initiation in Cestrum nocturnum, A Long-Short Day Plant. II. A 24-Hour Versus a 16-Hour Photoperiod for Long Day Induction. 1, Plant Physio

Key concepts: photoperiodism, Biology, Horticulture, Botany

Related papers

Related paper 1Related paper 2Related paper 3
Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Floral Initiation in Cestrum nocturnum, A Long-Short Day Plant. II. A 24-Hour Versus a 16-Hour Photoperiod for Long Day Induction. — Research Paper | ScholarLens