2010•Desalination and Water TreatmentOpen access

The effects of coagulation with MF/UF membrane filtration in drinking water treatment

H.N. Jang, D.S. Lee, Seok‐Oh Ko

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

This study proposes coagulation as a pretreatment permitting the optimal operation of drinking water membrane treatment process. Membrane fouling was evaluated for various coagulation control methods and different membrane types [microfiltration (MF)/ultrafiltration (UF)]. A system using MF and UF was operated at a permeate flux of 1.5, 2.0 (m3/m2) day. For the direct membrane filtration process without a pretreatment process (Run A), the days of effective operation (Te) under 1.0 kgfcm−2 of trans-membrane pressure (TMP) reached 33 days. It is thought that a pretreatment process was required to remove micro-particles that cause membrane fouling. In the case of coagulation control, according to raw water turbidity (Run B), the Te was 50 days. On the other hand, it could be seen that the membrane filtration system (Run C) that controls the coagulant dose based on the streaming current value (SCV) measurement operated at higher stability (95 days) than previous tests, even under high turbidity (>200 NTU). Pilot plant operation with a UF membrane was more stable than one with an MF membrane. In addition, the TMP in the coagulation/UF process was maintained at a significantly stable level despite the high permeate flux of 2.0 (m3/m2) day, when coagulation was controlled by SCV. It can be concluded that the membrane filtration process operated with higher stability when the coagulant dose was properly controlled by SCV.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study proposes coagulation as a pretreatment permitting the optimal operation of drinking water membrane treatment process. Membrane fouling was evaluated for various coagulation control methods and different membrane types [microfiltration (MF)/ultrafiltration (UF)]. A system using MF and UF was operated at a permeate flux of 1.5, 2.0 (m3/m2) day. For the direct membrane filtration process without a pretreatment process (Run A), the days of effective operation (Te) under 1.0 kgfcm−2 of trans-membrane pressure (TMP) reached 33 days. It is thought that a pretreatment process was required to remove micro-particles that cause membrane fouling. In the case of coagulation control, according to raw water turbidity (Run B), the Te was 50 days. On the other hand, it could be seen that the membrane filtration system (Run C) that controls the coagulant dose based on the streaming current value (SCV) measurement operated at higher stability (95 days) than previous tests, even under high turbidity (>200 NTU). Pilot plant operation with a UF membrane was more stable than one with an MF membrane. In addition, the TMP in the coagulation/UF process was maintained at a significantly stable level despite the high permeate flux of 2.0 (m3/m2) day, when coagulation was controlled by SCV. It can be concluded that the membrane filtration process operated with higher stability when the coagulant dose was properly controlled by SCV.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study proposes coagulation as a pretreatment permitting the optimal operation of drinking water membrane treatment process. Membrane fouling was evaluated for various coagulation control methods and different membrane types [microfiltration (MF)/ultrafiltration (UF)]. A system using MF and UF was operated at a permeate flux of 1.5, 2.0 (m3/m2) day. For the direct membrane filtration process without a pretreatment process (Run A), the days of effective operation (Te) under 1.0 kgfcm−2 of trans-membrane pressure (TMP) reached 33 days. It is thought that a pretreatment process was required to remove micro-particles that cause membrane fouling. In the case of coagulation control, according to raw water turbidity (Run B), the Te was 50 days. On the other hand, it could be seen that the membrane filtration system (Run C) that controls the coagulant dose based on the streaming current value (SCV) measurement operated at higher stability (95 days) than previous tests, even under high turbidity (>200 NTU). Pilot plant operation with a UF membrane was more stable than one with an MF membrane. In addition, the TMP in the coagulation/UF process was maintained at a significantly stable level despite the high permeate flux of 2.0 (m3/m2) day, when coagulation was controlled by SCV. It can be concluded that the membrane filtration process operated with higher stability when the coagulant dose was properly controlled by SCV.

Key concepts: Microfiltration, Ultrafiltration (renal), Coagulation, Membrane fouling, Filtration (mathematics), Turbidity, Membrane, Chemistry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The effects of coagulation with MF/UF membrane filtration in drinking water treatment — Research Paper | ScholarLens