2013Preparative Biochemistry & BiotechnologyRequires access

COMPARISON OF PHOSPHATE ESTIMATING METHODS IN THE PRESENCE OF PHYTIC ACID FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PHYTASE ACTIVITY

Suma Sanikommu, Mukesh Pasupuleti, Lakshmipathi Vadalkonda

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Phosphate released from phytic acid can be used as a measure of phytase activity. However, most of the phosphate estimation methods have not examined the interference or interaction of phytic acid in the assay. In this article, we report the kinetics and influence of unreduced phytic acid on phosphate estimation by three of the often-used methods for phytase estimation, the AOAC, Cooper-Gowing, and Fiske-Subbarow methods. Our results show that the AOAC method is most suitable to estimate the phytase activity in the presence of phytate in the medium. In the Fiske and Subbarow method, we noticed that the time factor plays a role in the interference of the phytic acid; especially the readings taken during the second hour of incubation are influenced by the presence of phytic acid. The method of Cooper and Gowing is labor-intensive and is prone to give error values at higher concentrations.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Phosphate released from phytic acid can be used as a measure of phytase activity. However, most of the phosphate estimation methods have not examined the interference or interaction of phytic acid in the assay. In this article, we report the kinetics and influence of unreduced phytic acid on phosphate estimation by three of the often-used methods for phytase estimation, the AOAC, Cooper-Gowing, and Fiske-Subbarow methods. Our results show that the AOAC method is most suitable to estimate the phytase activity in the presence of phytate in the medium. In the Fiske and Subbarow method, we noticed that the time factor plays a role in the interference of the phytic acid; especially the readings taken during the second hour of incubation are influenced by the presence of phytic acid. The method of Cooper and Gowing is labor-intensive and is prone to give error values at higher concentrations.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Phosphate released from phytic acid can be used as a measure of phytase activity. However, most of the phosphate estimation methods have not examined the interference or interaction of phytic acid in the assay. In this article, we report the kinetics and influence of unreduced phytic acid on phosphate estimation by three of the often-used methods for phytase estimation, the AOAC, Cooper-Gowing, and Fiske-Subbarow methods. Our results show that the AOAC method is most suitable to estimate the phytase activity in the presence of phytate in the medium. In the Fiske and Subbarow method, we noticed that the time factor plays a role in the interference of the phytic acid; especially the readings taken during the second hour of incubation are influenced by the presence of phytic acid. The method of Cooper and Gowing is labor-intensive and is prone to give error values at higher concentrations.

Key concepts: Phytic acid, Phytase, Phosphate, Chemistry, Chromatography, Biochemistry, Enzyme

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARISON OF PHOSPHATE ESTIMATING METHODS IN THE PRESENCE OF PHYTIC ACID FOR THE DETERMINATION OF PHYTASE ACTIVITY — Research Paper | ScholarLens