1986British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical PsychologyRequires access

Sample size determination in replication attempts: The standard normal z test

Raphael Gillett

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

In the light of evidence suggesting that replication attempts are often markedly deficient in power, a case can be made for a more rigorous approach to sample size determination in such studies. A method is proposed which uses information provided by the original experiment to arrive at a distribution of probable effect sizes. The sample size to be employed in a replication attempt is that which supplies an expected power of the desired amount over the distribution of probable effect sizes. To facilitate the application of the method, formulae arc developed which provide a rapid, straightforward means of establishing the appropriate sample size when the significance test employed is the standard normal z test. Examples of sample size determination using the formulae are presented for replication studies investigating the difference between two means, the difference between two correlations, and the difference between two proportions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the light of evidence suggesting that replication attempts are often markedly deficient in power, a case can be made for a more rigorous approach to sample size determination in such studies. A method is proposed which uses information provided by the original experiment to arrive at a distribution of probable effect sizes. The sample size to be employed in a replication attempt is that which supplies an expected power of the desired amount over the distribution of probable effect sizes. To facilitate the application of the method, formulae arc developed which provide a rapid, straightforward means of establishing the appropriate sample size when the significance test employed is the standard normal z test. Examples of sample size determination using the formulae are presented for replication studies investigating the difference between two means, the difference between two correlations, and the difference between two proportions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the light of evidence suggesting that replication attempts are often markedly deficient in power, a case can be made for a more rigorous approach to sample size determination in such studies. A method is proposed which uses information provided by the original experiment to arrive at a distribution of probable effect sizes. The sample size to be employed in a replication attempt is that which supplies an expected power of the desired amount over the distribution of probable effect sizes. To facilitate the application of the method, formulae arc developed which provide a rapid, straightforward means of establishing the appropriate sample size when the significance test employed is the standard normal z test. Examples of sample size determination using the formulae are presented for replication studies investigating the difference between two means, the difference between two correlations, and the difference between two proportions.

Key concepts: Replication (statistics), Sample size determination, Statistics, Sample (material), Mathematics, Distribution (mathematics), Significant difference, Power (physics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Sample size determination in replication attempts: The standard normal z test — Research Paper | ScholarLens