2015Annals of Plastic SurgeryRequires access

The Average Size and Position of the Umbilicus in Young Men and Women

Deborah Yu, Wendy M. Novicoff, Thomas J. Gampper

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Abdominoplasty was the third most common cosmetic surgical procedure in 2012. The umbilicus is transposed within the abdominal skin flap during this procedure. Few studies address the size and location of the umbilicus with precise measurements as well as those that do report on a heterogeneous population. The goal of our study was to determine the average size and position of the ideal umbilicus by limiting the study to young men and women of normal body habitus. METHODS: Subjects were recruited in a University of Virginia Institutional Review Board-approved study. Demographics of the subjects were recorded. Each subject's umbilicus was assessed for height, width, and position relative to existing landmarks. RESULTS: Eighty subjects met the inclusion criteria: 43 women and 37 men. Most of the subjects were white (72.5%). The mean ± SD BMI was 22.4 ± 2.5 kg/m. The mean ± SD height and width of the umbilicus was 2.1 ± 0.6 cm and 2.3 ± 0.7 cm, respectively. The umbilicus was located at a mean ± SD of -0.7 ± 1.3 cm in relation to the iliac crest (crest at zero). There were differences seen in the position between men and women. There were no statistical differences in measurements between the races. CONCLUSION: Our study serves as a guide for umbilical positioning with mean measurements for men and women, and categorized by sex and race.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION: Abdominoplasty was the third most common cosmetic surgical procedure in 2012. The umbilicus is transposed within the abdominal skin flap during this procedure. Few studies address the size and location of the umbilicus with precise measurements as well as those that do report on a heterogeneous population. The goal of our study was to determine the average size and position of the ideal umbilicus by limiting the study to young men and women of normal body habitus. METHODS: Subjects were recruited in a University of Virginia Institutional Review Board-approved study. Demographics of the subjects were recorded. Each subject's umbilicus was assessed for height, width, and position relative to existing landmarks. RESULTS: Eighty subjects met the inclusion criteria: 43 women and 37 men. Most of the subjects were white (72.5%). The mean ± SD BMI was 22.4 ± 2.5 kg/m. The mean ± SD height and width of the umbilicus was 2.1 ± 0.6 cm and 2.3 ± 0.7 cm, respectively. The umbilicus was located at a mean ± SD of -0.7 ± 1.3 cm in relation to the iliac crest (crest at zero). There were differences seen in the position between men and women. There were no statistical differences in measurements between the races. CONCLUSION: Our study serves as a guide for umbilical positioning with mean measurements for men and women, and categorized by sex and race.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION: Abdominoplasty was the third most common cosmetic surgical procedure in 2012. The umbilicus is transposed within the abdominal skin flap during this procedure. Few studies address the size and location of the umbilicus with precise measurements as well as those that do report on a heterogeneous population. The goal of our study was to determine the average size and position of the ideal umbilicus by limiting the study to young men and women of normal body habitus. METHODS: Subjects were recruited in a University of Virginia Institutional Review Board-approved study. Demographics of the subjects were recorded. Each subject's umbilicus was assessed for height, width, and position relative to existing landmarks. RESULTS: Eighty subjects met the inclusion criteria: 43 women and 37 men. Most of the subjects were white (72.5%). The mean ± SD BMI was 22.4 ± 2.5 kg/m. The mean ± SD height and width of the umbilicus was 2.1 ± 0.6 cm and 2.3 ± 0.7 cm, respectively. The umbilicus was located at a mean ± SD of -0.7 ± 1.3 cm in relation to the iliac crest (crest at zero). There were differences seen in the position between men and women. There were no statistical differences in measurements between the races. CONCLUSION: Our study serves as a guide for umbilical positioning with mean measurements for men and women, and categorized by sex and race.

Key concepts: Umbilicus (mollusc), Medicine, Iliac crest, Abdominoplasty, Population, Surgery, Demography, Anatomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Average Size and Position of the Umbilicus in Young Men and Women — Research Paper | ScholarLens