1996American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care MedicineRequires access

Ethical Considerations of Ensuring an Informed and Autonomous Consent in Research Involving Critically Ill Patients

Henry Silverman

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

Despite several codes of research ethics, the issuance of comprehensive rules regarding informed consent by governmental agencies, and numerous writings on the subject of informed consent, many commentators still question the quality of the informed consent process in clinical research. A major concern is that investigators emphasize only the information-giving aspect of "informed" consent, whereas moral philosophy stresses a more robust concept of informed consent that incorporates the additional requirements of subject competence and voluntariness of the consent, thus ensuring that a consent is not only informed, but autonomous as well. This article aims to examine the issues involved with disclosure, competence, and voluntariness, especially those related to research involving critically ill patients. Suggestions concerning methods that can promote an informed consent process that is more respectful of autonomous decision making will also be discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Despite several codes of research ethics, the issuance of comprehensive rules regarding informed consent by governmental agencies, and numerous writings on the subject of informed consent, many commentators still question the quality of the informed consent process in clinical research. A major concern is that investigators emphasize only the information-giving aspect of "informed" consent, whereas moral philosophy stresses a more robust concept of informed consent that incorporates the additional requirements of subject competence and voluntariness of the consent, thus ensuring that a consent is not only informed, but autonomous as well. This article aims to examine the issues involved with disclosure, competence, and voluntariness, especially those related to research involving critically ill patients. Suggestions concerning methods that can promote an informed consent process that is more respectful of autonomous decision making will also be discussed.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Despite several codes of research ethics, the issuance of comprehensive rules regarding informed consent by governmental agencies, and numerous writings on the subject of informed consent, many commentators still question the quality of the informed consent process in clinical research. A major concern is that investigators emphasize only the information-giving aspect of "informed" consent, whereas moral philosophy stresses a more robust concept of informed consent that incorporates the additional requirements of subject competence and voluntariness of the consent, thus ensuring that a consent is not only informed, but autonomous as well. This article aims to examine the issues involved with disclosure, competence, and voluntariness, especially those related to research involving critically ill patients. Suggestions concerning methods that can promote an informed consent process that is more respectful of autonomous decision making will also be discussed.

Key concepts: Voluntariness, Informed consent, Competence (human resources), Medicine, Engineering ethics, Research ethics, Psychology, Social psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ethical Considerations of Ensuring an Informed and Autonomous Consent in Research Involving Critically Ill Patients — Research Paper | ScholarLens