1989The Journal of Social PsychologyRequires access

The Stereotypical Nature of Stereotyping

Richard N. Williams, Ximena de la Cruz, Wayne J. Hintze

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

The nature of male and female stereotypes of a sample of American students was examined by employing a matched-guise technique. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of more versus less obtrusive methods for measuring stereotypes, to study stereotyping effects in the presence of quasi-realistic information about individuals, and to address an assumed positive bias attached to the male stereotype. The traditional stereotypes were elicited in the general case, whereas there were a few differences attributed to individual personality descriptions based on the sex of the persons described. There was some evidence for a small core of adjectives that might form a basis for sex stereotypes. There was no evidence for a positive bias attached to the male stereotype. Male and female respondents differed in their perception of sex stereotypes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The nature of male and female stereotypes of a sample of American students was examined by employing a matched-guise technique. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of more versus less obtrusive methods for measuring stereotypes, to study stereotyping effects in the presence of quasi-realistic information about individuals, and to address an assumed positive bias attached to the male stereotype. The traditional stereotypes were elicited in the general case, whereas there were a few differences attributed to individual personality descriptions based on the sex of the persons described. There was some evidence for a small core of adjectives that might form a basis for sex stereotypes. There was no evidence for a positive bias attached to the male stereotype. Male and female respondents differed in their perception of sex stereotypes.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The nature of male and female stereotypes of a sample of American students was examined by employing a matched-guise technique. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effects of more versus less obtrusive methods for measuring stereotypes, to study stereotyping effects in the presence of quasi-realistic information about individuals, and to address an assumed positive bias attached to the male stereotype. The traditional stereotypes were elicited in the general case, whereas there were a few differences attributed to individual personality descriptions based on the sex of the persons described. There was some evidence for a small core of adjectives that might form a basis for sex stereotypes. There was no evidence for a positive bias attached to the male stereotype. Male and female respondents differed in their perception of sex stereotypes.

Key concepts: Stereotype (UML), Psychology, Social psychology, Perception, Personality, Social perception, Developmental psychology, Neuroscience

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Stereotypical Nature of Stereotyping — Research Paper | ScholarLens