2010Unpublished venueRequires access

Bad Music

Stahl, Matt

Open publisher page 51 citations

Abstract

In the summer of 2002, a musical talent contest-cum-reality televi-sion program snowballed into a multi-platform blockbustermegahit in a little over three months; by all measures, the 2003 and 2004 season has so far surpassed their predecessor.3 Like previous radio and television talent contests, American Idol depended on audience voting for its selection of a winner. And, like the reality TV programs that have recently come to dominate American prime time, the show focused on the character development of an ever-dwindling pool of contestants. Combining the democratic principle of an audience vote and the narrative principle of the months-long competition, American Idol was a marketing phenomenon of unprecedented efficacy in the United States popular music industry. Telling captivating stories about its contestants and grueling audition process, the 2002 season produced a windfall for advertisers and a massive body of deeply invested fans for winner Kelly Clarkson and several of her runners-up.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the summer of 2002, a musical talent contest-cum-reality televi-sion program snowballed into a multi-platform blockbustermegahit in a little over three months; by all measures, the 2003 and 2004 season has so far surpassed their predecessor.3 Like previous radio and television talent contests, American Idol depended on audience voting for its selection of a winner. And, like the reality TV programs that have recently come to dominate American prime time, the show focused on the character development of an ever-dwindling pool of contestants. Combining the democratic principle of an audience vote and the narrative principle of the months-long competition, American Idol was a marketing phenomenon of unprecedented efficacy in the United States popular music industry. Telling captivating stories about its contestants and grueling audition process, the 2002 season produced a windfall for advertisers and a massive body of deeply invested fans for winner Kelly Clarkson and several of her runners-up.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 51 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the summer of 2002, a musical talent contest-cum-reality televi-sion program snowballed into a multi-platform blockbustermegahit in a little over three months; by all measures, the 2003 and 2004 season has so far surpassed their predecessor.3 Like previous radio and television talent contests, American Idol depended on audience voting for its selection of a winner. And, like the reality TV programs that have recently come to dominate American prime time, the show focused on the character development of an ever-dwindling pool of contestants. Combining the democratic principle of an audience vote and the narrative principle of the months-long competition, American Idol was a marketing phenomenon of unprecedented efficacy in the United States popular music industry. Telling captivating stories about its contestants and grueling audition process, the 2002 season produced a windfall for advertisers and a massive body of deeply invested fans for winner Kelly Clarkson and several of her runners-up.

Key concepts: Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bad Music — Research Paper | ScholarLens