1965The Journal of General PhysiologyOpen access

Effects of Alkali Metal Gations on the Potential across Toad and Bullfrog Urinary Bladder

Daniel E. Leb, T. Hoshiko, Barry D. Lindley with the technical assistance of James A. Dugan

Open full text 46 citations

Abstract

Isolated urinary bladders of the bullfrog (R. catesbeiana) and the toad (B. marinus) were mounted in an Ussing chamber. Potential differences up to 114 mv were observed in bullfrog bladder when the mucosal surface was bathed in dilute Na(2)SO(4) and the serosal surface in sulfate Ringer's. In experiments with bullfrogs, K was used to replace Na in the mucosal solution and Na was used for K in the serosal solutions. The selectivity was judged in terms of the relative effectiveness of the replacement cation in maintaining the bladder potential. In experiments with toads, K and Rb were equally poor replacements for Na at the mucosal border, while Rb was a good replacement for K at the serosal border. Li in the mucosal solution appeared to depress the potential in part irreversibly. At the serosal border, Li was a partially effective substitute for K, more so than was Na. However, both were poor replacements compared to Rb. The mucosal surface of the urinary bladder of both frog and toad appears to be Na-selective and the serosal surface appears to be K-selective, consistent with the Koefoed-Johnsen-Ussing model for frog skin.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Isolated urinary bladders of the bullfrog (R. catesbeiana) and the toad (B. marinus) were mounted in an Ussing chamber. Potential differences up to 114 mv were observed in bullfrog bladder when the mucosal surface was bathed in dilute Na(2)SO(4) and the serosal surface in sulfate Ringer's. In experiments with bullfrogs, K was used to replace Na in the mucosal solution and Na was used for K in the serosal solutions. The selectivity was judged in terms of the relative effectiveness of the replacement cation in maintaining the bladder potential. In experiments with toads, K and Rb were equally poor replacements for Na at the mucosal border, while Rb was a good replacement for K at the serosal border. Li in the mucosal solution appeared to depress the potential in part irreversibly. At the serosal border, Li was a partially effective substitute for K, more so than was Na. However, both were poor replacements compared to Rb. The mucosal surface of the urinary bladder of both frog and toad appears to be Na-selective and the serosal surface appears to be K-selective, consistent with the Koefoed-Johnsen-Ussing model for frog skin.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 46 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Isolated urinary bladders of the bullfrog (R. catesbeiana) and the toad (B. marinus) were mounted in an Ussing chamber. Potential differences up to 114 mv were observed in bullfrog bladder when the mucosal surface was bathed in dilute Na(2)SO(4) and the serosal surface in sulfate Ringer's. In experiments with bullfrogs, K was used to replace Na in the mucosal solution and Na was used for K in the serosal solutions. The selectivity was judged in terms of the relative effectiveness of the replacement cation in maintaining the bladder potential. In experiments with toads, K and Rb were equally poor replacements for Na at the mucosal border, while Rb was a good replacement for K at the serosal border. Li in the mucosal solution appeared to depress the potential in part irreversibly. At the serosal border, Li was a partially effective substitute for K, more so than was Na. However, both were poor replacements compared to Rb. The mucosal surface of the urinary bladder of both frog and toad appears to be Na-selective and the serosal surface appears to be K-selective, consistent with the Koefoed-Johnsen-Ussing model for frog skin.

Key concepts: Bullfrog, Toad, Rana, GRENOUILLE, Chemistry, Urinary bladder, Transepithelial potential difference, Frog Skin

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effects of Alkali Metal Gations on the Potential across Toad and Bullfrog Urinary Bladder — Research Paper | ScholarLens