1991The Astrophysical JournalRequires access

About the stage of evolution of Wolf-Rayet stars

Anne B. Underhill

Open publisher page 12 citations

Abstract

The basis for the suggestion by Bhatia and Underhill (1988) to the effect that Wolf-Rayet stars are young massive objects only now arriving on the main sequence and still enveloped in a remnant of their natal cloud is reviewed, and it is shown that the arguments of Lamers et al. (1991) that Wolf-Rayet stars are the endpoints of massive star evolution are not valid. The hypothesis that Population I Wolf-Rayet stars are massive young stellar objects associated with O and B stars is useful for coordinating the available information about Wolf-Rayet stars. A few central stars of planetary nebulae also show a Wolf-Rayet-type spectrum; they appear to be low-mass stars at a late stage of evolution. It is argued that exhibiting a Wolf-Rayet-type spectrum is a trait of a few massive stars and of a few evolved low-mass stars.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The basis for the suggestion by Bhatia and Underhill (1988) to the effect that Wolf-Rayet stars are young massive objects only now arriving on the main sequence and still enveloped in a remnant of their natal cloud is reviewed, and it is shown that the arguments of Lamers et al. (1991) that Wolf-Rayet stars are the endpoints of massive star evolution are not valid. The hypothesis that Population I Wolf-Rayet stars are massive young stellar objects associated with O and B stars is useful for coordinating the available information about Wolf-Rayet stars. A few central stars of planetary nebulae also show a Wolf-Rayet-type spectrum; they appear to be low-mass stars at a late stage of evolution. It is argued that exhibiting a Wolf-Rayet-type spectrum is a trait of a few massive stars and of a few evolved low-mass stars.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 12 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The basis for the suggestion by Bhatia and Underhill (1988) to the effect that Wolf-Rayet stars are young massive objects only now arriving on the main sequence and still enveloped in a remnant of their natal cloud is reviewed, and it is shown that the arguments of Lamers et al. (1991) that Wolf-Rayet stars are the endpoints of massive star evolution are not valid. The hypothesis that Population I Wolf-Rayet stars are massive young stellar objects associated with O and B stars is useful for coordinating the available information about Wolf-Rayet stars. A few central stars of planetary nebulae also show a Wolf-Rayet-type spectrum; they appear to be low-mass stars at a late stage of evolution. It is argued that exhibiting a Wolf-Rayet-type spectrum is a trait of a few massive stars and of a few evolved low-mass stars.

Key concepts: Wolf–Rayet star, Physics, Stars, Astrophysics, Stellar mass loss, Astronomy, Stellar collision, K-type main-sequence star

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
About the stage of evolution of Wolf-Rayet stars — Research Paper | ScholarLens