Comparisons of electron beam dose measurements in water and polystyrene using various dosimeters
Kenneth R. Kase, Gary J. Adler, Bengt E. Bjärngard
Abstract
Kenneth R. Kase, Gary J. Adler, Bengt E. Bjärngard
Abstract
A comparison has been made of central axis percent depth dose and absorbed dose in electron beams of 7.8 and 10.2 MeV, measured with devices of differing geometry and construction. Flat and cylindrical ionization chambers have been used as well as thin thermoluminescent dosimeters. The ionization chambers had walls of air equivalent or tissue equivalent plastic. Results indicate that central axis depth dose measurements are independent of measuring device. No significant difference was found among the various ionization chambers with air equivalent walls in the determination of absorbed dose. The dose determined by the tissue-equivalent wall chamber was about 3% higher than the dose determined by the other ionization chambers. Dose maximum on the central axis in water is about 4% greater than when this same quantity is calculated from data measured in polystyrene.
OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
A comparison has been made of central axis percent depth dose and absorbed dose in electron beams of 7.8 and 10.2 MeV, measured with devices of differing geometry and construction. Flat and cylindrical ionization chambers have been used as well as thin thermoluminescent dosimeters. The ionization chambers had walls of air equivalent or tissue equivalent plastic. Results indicate that central axis depth dose measurements are independent of measuring device. No significant difference was found among the various ionization chambers with air equivalent walls in the determination of absorbed dose. The dose determined by the tissue-equivalent wall chamber was about 3% higher than the dose determined by the other ionization chambers. Dose maximum on the central axis in water is about 4% greater than when this same quantity is calculated from data measured in polystyrene.
Key concepts: Dosimeter, Ionization chamber, Percentage depth dose curve, Absorbed dose, Ionization, Dosimetry, Dose profile, Materials science