2001BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & GynaecologyRequires access

Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of complex Müllerian anomalies

Catherine L Minto, Nicholas Hollings, Margaret Hall‐Craggs, Sarah Creighton

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of adolescent patients with complex Müllerian anomalies and its contribution towards operative management. DESIGN: A retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings. SETTING: A London teaching hospital that is a tertiary referral centre for complex reproductive tract disorders. SAMPLE: All adolescents referred for assessment of complex Müllerian anomalies, from 1996 to 1999, and undergoing both magnetic resonance imaging and surgical assessment. METHOD: In the nine suitable patients magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings were compared and the role of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the route and type of surgery was evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Magnetic resonance imaging data on reproductive tract anatomy and surgical findings detailing reproductive tract anatomy. RESULTS: There was good correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings in all cases. The best correlation was with uterine structure. In four cases the magnetic resonance imaging findings were essential for the appropriate choice of the surgical approach and type of procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable tool in the management of this particular complex group of patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of adolescent patients with complex Müllerian anomalies and its contribution towards operative management. DESIGN: A retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings. SETTING: A London teaching hospital that is a tertiary referral centre for complex reproductive tract disorders. SAMPLE: All adolescents referred for assessment of complex Müllerian anomalies, from 1996 to 1999, and undergoing both magnetic resonance imaging and surgical assessment. METHOD: In the nine suitable patients magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings were compared and the role of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the route and type of surgery was evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Magnetic resonance imaging data on reproductive tract anatomy and surgical findings detailing reproductive tract anatomy. RESULTS: There was good correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings in all cases. The best correlation was with uterine structure. In four cases the magnetic resonance imaging findings were essential for the appropriate choice of the surgical approach and type of procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable tool in the management of this particular complex group of patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of adolescent patients with complex Müllerian anomalies and its contribution towards operative management. DESIGN: A retrospective review of magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings. SETTING: A London teaching hospital that is a tertiary referral centre for complex reproductive tract disorders. SAMPLE: All adolescents referred for assessment of complex Müllerian anomalies, from 1996 to 1999, and undergoing both magnetic resonance imaging and surgical assessment. METHOD: In the nine suitable patients magnetic resonance imaging and surgical findings were compared and the role of magnetic resonance imaging in determining the route and type of surgery was evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Magnetic resonance imaging data on reproductive tract anatomy and surgical findings detailing reproductive tract anatomy. RESULTS: There was good correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and operative findings in all cases. The best correlation was with uterine structure. In four cases the magnetic resonance imaging findings were essential for the appropriate choice of the surgical approach and type of procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Magnetic resonance imaging is a valuable tool in the management of this particular complex group of patients.

Key concepts: Magnetic resonance imaging, Medicine, Radiology, Tertiary referral centre, Surgery

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of complex Müllerian anomalies — Research Paper | ScholarLens