2014•Unpublished venueRequires access

Implant dopant activation comparison between silicon and germanium

John Ogawa Borland, Paul T. Konkola

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

We report room temperature p-type acceptor formation in Ge from B and C implant damage up to a level of 120Ω/□ or 1E19/cm3. For n-type dopant implants in Ge we found that an oxide surface capping layer was required above 625°C to prevent dopant surface loss. P followed by As then Sb gave the best dopant activation and at the same low temperature anneal B, P, As and Sb Rs values were always lower in Ge by 1.3x to 3x than in Si possibly directly related to the higher mobility ratio in Ge to Si and differences in Ge dopant surface loss and segregation into oxide.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We report room temperature p-type acceptor formation in Ge from B and C implant damage up to a level of 120Ω/□ or 1E19/cm3. For n-type dopant implants in Ge we found that an oxide surface capping layer was required above 625°C to prevent dopant surface loss. P followed by As then Sb gave the best dopant activation and at the same low temperature anneal B, P, As and Sb Rs values were always lower in Ge by 1.3x to 3x than in Si possibly directly related to the higher mobility ratio in Ge to Si and differences in Ge dopant surface loss and segregation into oxide.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We report room temperature p-type acceptor formation in Ge from B and C implant damage up to a level of 120Ω/□ or 1E19/cm3. For n-type dopant implants in Ge we found that an oxide surface capping layer was required above 625°C to prevent dopant surface loss. P followed by As then Sb gave the best dopant activation and at the same low temperature anneal B, P, As and Sb Rs values were always lower in Ge by 1.3x to 3x than in Si possibly directly related to the higher mobility ratio in Ge to Si and differences in Ge dopant surface loss and segregation into oxide.

Key concepts: Dopant, Dopant Activation, Germanium, Materials science, Silicon, Acceptor, Oxide, Doping

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Implant dopant activation comparison between silicon and germanium — Research Paper | ScholarLens