Implant dopant activation comparison between silicon and germanium
John Ogawa Borland, Paul T. Konkola
Abstract
John Ogawa Borland, Paul T. Konkola
Abstract
We report room temperature p-type acceptor formation in Ge from B and C implant damage up to a level of 120Ω/□ or 1E19/cm3. For n-type dopant implants in Ge we found that an oxide surface capping layer was required above 625°C to prevent dopant surface loss. P followed by As then Sb gave the best dopant activation and at the same low temperature anneal B, P, As and Sb Rs values were always lower in Ge by 1.3x to 3x than in Si possibly directly related to the higher mobility ratio in Ge to Si and differences in Ge dopant surface loss and segregation into oxide.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We report room temperature p-type acceptor formation in Ge from B and C implant damage up to a level of 120Ω/□ or 1E19/cm3. For n-type dopant implants in Ge we found that an oxide surface capping layer was required above 625°C to prevent dopant surface loss. P followed by As then Sb gave the best dopant activation and at the same low temperature anneal B, P, As and Sb Rs values were always lower in Ge by 1.3x to 3x than in Si possibly directly related to the higher mobility ratio in Ge to Si and differences in Ge dopant surface loss and segregation into oxide.
Key concepts: Dopant, Dopant Activation, Germanium, Materials science, Silicon, Acceptor, Oxide, Doping