2005Acta Crystallographica Section D Biological CrystallographyRequires access

Improving experimental phasing: the role of strongest reflections

Yanina Vekhter

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Very strong reflections have a dominant impact on the initial phasing and model-building stages of structure determination. However, experimental phasing (MIR, SAD or MAD) fails on some of the strongest reflections when the heavy-atom contribution to scattering is relatively weak or absent. It is shown that when just a few (approximately 50-100) of these reflections are assigned low-error phases, the entire set of isomorphous replacement phases becomes significantly improved after density modification. This improvement is indicated by higher map correlation coefficients and reduced mean phase errors of the updated data. The problem of phasing the strongest reflections may be solved by the direct measurement of triplet phases in a three-beam diffraction experiment. The analysis shows that merging isomorphous replacement data with a limited number of highly accurate phases from the reference-beam diffraction experiment would significantly improve conventional experimental phasing.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Very strong reflections have a dominant impact on the initial phasing and model-building stages of structure determination. However, experimental phasing (MIR, SAD or MAD) fails on some of the strongest reflections when the heavy-atom contribution to scattering is relatively weak or absent. It is shown that when just a few (approximately 50-100) of these reflections are assigned low-error phases, the entire set of isomorphous replacement phases becomes significantly improved after density modification. This improvement is indicated by higher map correlation coefficients and reduced mean phase errors of the updated data. The problem of phasing the strongest reflections may be solved by the direct measurement of triplet phases in a three-beam diffraction experiment. The analysis shows that merging isomorphous replacement data with a limited number of highly accurate phases from the reference-beam diffraction experiment would significantly improve conventional experimental phasing.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Very strong reflections have a dominant impact on the initial phasing and model-building stages of structure determination. However, experimental phasing (MIR, SAD or MAD) fails on some of the strongest reflections when the heavy-atom contribution to scattering is relatively weak or absent. It is shown that when just a few (approximately 50-100) of these reflections are assigned low-error phases, the entire set of isomorphous replacement phases becomes significantly improved after density modification. This improvement is indicated by higher map correlation coefficients and reduced mean phase errors of the updated data. The problem of phasing the strongest reflections may be solved by the direct measurement of triplet phases in a three-beam diffraction experiment. The analysis shows that merging isomorphous replacement data with a limited number of highly accurate phases from the reference-beam diffraction experiment would significantly improve conventional experimental phasing.

Key concepts: Phaser, Diffraction, Phase (matter), Scattering, Optics, Set (abstract data type), Beam (structure), Computational physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improving experimental phasing: the role of strongest reflections — Research Paper | ScholarLens