2013OtolaryngologyRequires access

Eustachian Tube Function in Children with Normal Middle Ear and with Tympanic Membrane Retraction

Inesângela Canali, Letícia S. Rosito, Sady Selaimen da Costa, Bruno Siliprandi, Cláudia Giugno

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Objectives: Identify the variation in middle ear pressure (MEP) after tubal function tests performed in normal children and in ears with retraction disease. Variability over time was analyzed. Methods: Observational cross‐sectional study. A total of 38 subjects were studied between March and November of 2012. Subjects were classified into three groups: group1‐normal ears (36 ears); group2‐mild tympanic membrane (TM) retractions (23 ears); group3‐moderate/severe TM retractions (17 ears). All patients had Valsalva maneuver, sniff test and Toynbee maneuver done sequentially in both ears twice with 15 days interval. MEP was measured with an Interacoustics AT235h tympanometer before and after the maneuvers. For analysis, MEP mixed effects models was used. For evaluation over time, Bland and Altman and intra‐class correlation (ICC) were used. Significance of the study was ± = 0.05. Results: The mean ± SD age was 11 ± 2.72 years (8‐17 years). At first time of the Valsalva maneuver, there was a trend of increasing pressures in the three groups (P = 0.012), and the mean pressures of the groups were different (P <0.001). For the sniff test and Toynbee there was no statistically significant difference between basal pressure and pressure after the maneuvers in three groups of ears (P >0.05) at the two times. We found a moderate degree of replicability over the two times of measurement. Conclusions: The average MEP increased in the Valsalva maneuver in the three groups. Pressure had more variability in ears with moderate/severe retraction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives: Identify the variation in middle ear pressure (MEP) after tubal function tests performed in normal children and in ears with retraction disease. Variability over time was analyzed. Methods: Observational cross‐sectional study. A total of 38 subjects were studied between March and November of 2012. Subjects were classified into three groups: group1‐normal ears (36 ears); group2‐mild tympanic membrane (TM) retractions (23 ears); group3‐moderate/severe TM retractions (17 ears). All patients had Valsalva maneuver, sniff test and Toynbee maneuver done sequentially in both ears twice with 15 days interval. MEP was measured with an Interacoustics AT235h tympanometer before and after the maneuvers. For analysis, MEP mixed effects models was used. For evaluation over time, Bland and Altman and intra‐class correlation (ICC) were used. Significance of the study was ± = 0.05. Results: The mean ± SD age was 11 ± 2.72 years (8‐17 years). At first time of the Valsalva maneuver, there was a trend of increasing pressures in the three groups (P = 0.012), and the mean pressures of the groups were different (P <0.001). For the sniff test and Toynbee there was no statistically significant difference between basal pressure and pressure after the maneuvers in three groups of ears (P >0.05) at the two times. We found a moderate degree of replicability over the two times of measurement. Conclusions: The average MEP increased in the Valsalva maneuver in the three groups. Pressure had more variability in ears with moderate/severe retraction.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives: Identify the variation in middle ear pressure (MEP) after tubal function tests performed in normal children and in ears with retraction disease. Variability over time was analyzed. Methods: Observational cross‐sectional study. A total of 38 subjects were studied between March and November of 2012. Subjects were classified into three groups: group1‐normal ears (36 ears); group2‐mild tympanic membrane (TM) retractions (23 ears); group3‐moderate/severe TM retractions (17 ears). All patients had Valsalva maneuver, sniff test and Toynbee maneuver done sequentially in both ears twice with 15 days interval. MEP was measured with an Interacoustics AT235h tympanometer before and after the maneuvers. For analysis, MEP mixed effects models was used. For evaluation over time, Bland and Altman and intra‐class correlation (ICC) were used. Significance of the study was ± = 0.05. Results: The mean ± SD age was 11 ± 2.72 years (8‐17 years). At first time of the Valsalva maneuver, there was a trend of increasing pressures in the three groups (P = 0.012), and the mean pressures of the groups were different (P <0.001). For the sniff test and Toynbee there was no statistically significant difference between basal pressure and pressure after the maneuvers in three groups of ears (P >0.05) at the two times. We found a moderate degree of replicability over the two times of measurement. Conclusions: The average MEP increased in the Valsalva maneuver in the three groups. Pressure had more variability in ears with moderate/severe retraction.

Key concepts: Valsalva maneuver, Medicine, Eustachian tube, Middle ear, Limits of agreement, Surgery, Blood pressure, Nuclear medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Eustachian Tube Function in Children with Normal Middle Ear and with Tympanic Membrane Retraction — Research Paper | ScholarLens