1989•IEEE Communications MagazineRequires access

Process control in standards bodies

Lukas Hohmann

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The author discusses major changes in the nature of telecommunication standards over the past 15 years. Fifteen years ago, standards followed technology, and manufacturers dominated standards activities. Contentions were avoided by adoption of multiple options in the standards. Today, users have a large presence in standards development. They demand interoperability of products and reject nonresolution on contentions. Standards processes are protracted and standards now lead technology. The author identifies three major trends. (1) Consumers and users in the telecommunications industry are increasingly demanding compliance with standards. (2) Standards activities are growing at a rapid rate. (3) There is a growing sense of urgency about standards. He asserts that these major trends can only be satisfied through increasing the responsiveness by standards bodies. He suggests seven ways to press for process control in standards bodies.>

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The author discusses major changes in the nature of telecommunication standards over the past 15 years. Fifteen years ago, standards followed technology, and manufacturers dominated standards activities. Contentions were avoided by adoption of multiple options in the standards. Today, users have a large presence in standards development. They demand interoperability of products and reject nonresolution on contentions. Standards processes are protracted and standards now lead technology. The author identifies three major trends. (1) Consumers and users in the telecommunications industry are increasingly demanding compliance with standards. (2) Standards activities are growing at a rapid rate. (3) There is a growing sense of urgency about standards. He asserts that these major trends can only be satisfied through increasing the responsiveness by standards bodies. He suggests seven ways to press for process control in standards bodies.>

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The author discusses major changes in the nature of telecommunication standards over the past 15 years. Fifteen years ago, standards followed technology, and manufacturers dominated standards activities. Contentions were avoided by adoption of multiple options in the standards. Today, users have a large presence in standards development. They demand interoperability of products and reject nonresolution on contentions. Standards processes are protracted and standards now lead technology. The author identifies three major trends. (1) Consumers and users in the telecommunications industry are increasingly demanding compliance with standards. (2) Standards activities are growing at a rapid rate. (3) There is a growing sense of urgency about standards. He asserts that these major trends can only be satisfied through increasing the responsiveness by standards bodies. He suggests seven ways to press for process control in standards bodies.>

Key concepts: Interoperability, Technical standard, Process (computing), Computer science, Control (management), Open standard, Telecommunications, Engineering management

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Process control in standards bodies — Research Paper | ScholarLens