1998•Review of Radical Political EconomicsRequires access

Accumulation, Technical Change, and Prisoners' Dilemmas: A Rejoinder to Frank Thompson

David Laibman

Open publisher page 7 citations

Abstract

Frank Thompson has proposed (this Review, 30(1): 90-107) that accumulation can cause the profit rate to fall (by forcing the wage rate to rise), but that biased technical change, by itself, can only cause the profit rate to rise (by forcing the wage rate to fall). By contrast, this paper argues that: 1) accumulation pressure generates cycles in the profit rate, but no trend; 2) biased technical change may (and in most circumstances is likely to) produce cycles around a falling trend. This is because the fall in the profit rate is associated with a rise in the profit share, and this latter rise reduces the degree of the optimal bias sought by capitalists and therefore establishes dynamic balance in the labor market at a lower rate of profit. Marx's story is therefore confirmed in a nuanced and conditional manner that focuses attention on the empirical conditions and social relations pro-ducing this particular contradictory law of motion.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Frank Thompson has proposed (this Review, 30(1): 90-107) that accumulation can cause the profit rate to fall (by forcing the wage rate to rise), but that biased technical change, by itself, can only cause the profit rate to rise (by forcing the wage rate to fall). By contrast, this paper argues that: 1) accumulation pressure generates cycles in the profit rate, but no trend; 2) biased technical change may (and in most circumstances is likely to) produce cycles around a falling trend. This is because the fall in the profit rate is associated with a rise in the profit share, and this latter rise reduces the degree of the optimal bias sought by capitalists and therefore establishes dynamic balance in the labor market at a lower rate of profit. Marx's story is therefore confirmed in a nuanced and conditional manner that focuses attention on the empirical conditions and social relations pro-ducing this particular contradictory law of motion.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Frank Thompson has proposed (this Review, 30(1): 90-107) that accumulation can cause the profit rate to fall (by forcing the wage rate to rise), but that biased technical change, by itself, can only cause the profit rate to rise (by forcing the wage rate to fall). By contrast, this paper argues that: 1) accumulation pressure generates cycles in the profit rate, but no trend; 2) biased technical change may (and in most circumstances is likely to) produce cycles around a falling trend. This is because the fall in the profit rate is associated with a rise in the profit share, and this latter rise reduces the degree of the optimal bias sought by capitalists and therefore establishes dynamic balance in the labor market at a lower rate of profit. Marx's story is therefore confirmed in a nuanced and conditional manner that focuses attention on the empirical conditions and social relations pro-ducing this particular contradictory law of motion.

Key concepts: Rate of profit, Economics, Wage rate, Profit rate, Profit (economics), Wage, Fall of man, Keynesian economics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Accumulation, Technical Change, and Prisoners' Dilemmas: A Rejoinder to Frank Thompson — Research Paper | ScholarLens