2004Scandinavian Journal of GastroenterologyRequires access

Villous tip intraepithelial lymphocytes as markers of early‐stage coeliac disease

Teea T Järvinen, Pekka Collin, Martin Rasmussen, Sinikka Kyrönpalo, Markku Mäki, Jukka Partanen, Timo Reunala, Katri Kaukinen

Open publisher page 117 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An investigation was conducted to determine whether the density of small-intestinal villous tip intraepithelial lymphocytes would be of value in clinical practice in uncovering early-stage coeliac disease. METHODS: Villous tip, CD3+ and gammadelta+ intraepithelial lymphocytes were counted in patients with definite early-stage coeliac disease without villous atrophy, in classic coeliac disease with manifest mucosal lesion and in non-coeliac controls with normal mucosal structure. Villous tip analysis was made of haematoxylin-eosin specimens and CD3+ and gammadelta+ of immunohistochemical stainings from frozen samples. RESULTS: The villous tip intraepithelial lymphocyte count was statistically significantly higher in patients with early-stage coeliac disease than in non-coeliac controls. The sensitivity of this method to detect untreated coeliac disease with normal villous architecture was 0.84; the specificity was 0.88. This method proved superior to CD3+ analysis and was at least as good as gammadelta+ analysis in detecting early-stage coeliac disease. In detecting classic coeliac disease, villous tip analysis also reached a higher sensitivity than CD3+ and gammadelta+ cells. CONCLUSIONS: Villous tip analysis seems to distinguish early coeliac from non-specific changes, thus providing a valuable tool in routine practice, especially when borderline findings are involved. Its value appears to be similar to counting of gammadelta+ cells, which, however, requires frozen biopsy samples.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: An investigation was conducted to determine whether the density of small-intestinal villous tip intraepithelial lymphocytes would be of value in clinical practice in uncovering early-stage coeliac disease. METHODS: Villous tip, CD3+ and gammadelta+ intraepithelial lymphocytes were counted in patients with definite early-stage coeliac disease without villous atrophy, in classic coeliac disease with manifest mucosal lesion and in non-coeliac controls with normal mucosal structure. Villous tip analysis was made of haematoxylin-eosin specimens and CD3+ and gammadelta+ of immunohistochemical stainings from frozen samples. RESULTS: The villous tip intraepithelial lymphocyte count was statistically significantly higher in patients with early-stage coeliac disease than in non-coeliac controls. The sensitivity of this method to detect untreated coeliac disease with normal villous architecture was 0.84; the specificity was 0.88. This method proved superior to CD3+ analysis and was at least as good as gammadelta+ analysis in detecting early-stage coeliac disease. In detecting classic coeliac disease, villous tip analysis also reached a higher sensitivity than CD3+ and gammadelta+ cells. CONCLUSIONS: Villous tip analysis seems to distinguish early coeliac from non-specific changes, thus providing a valuable tool in routine practice, especially when borderline findings are involved. Its value appears to be similar to counting of gammadelta+ cells, which, however, requires frozen biopsy samples.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 117 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: An investigation was conducted to determine whether the density of small-intestinal villous tip intraepithelial lymphocytes would be of value in clinical practice in uncovering early-stage coeliac disease. METHODS: Villous tip, CD3+ and gammadelta+ intraepithelial lymphocytes were counted in patients with definite early-stage coeliac disease without villous atrophy, in classic coeliac disease with manifest mucosal lesion and in non-coeliac controls with normal mucosal structure. Villous tip analysis was made of haematoxylin-eosin specimens and CD3+ and gammadelta+ of immunohistochemical stainings from frozen samples. RESULTS: The villous tip intraepithelial lymphocyte count was statistically significantly higher in patients with early-stage coeliac disease than in non-coeliac controls. The sensitivity of this method to detect untreated coeliac disease with normal villous architecture was 0.84; the specificity was 0.88. This method proved superior to CD3+ analysis and was at least as good as gammadelta+ analysis in detecting early-stage coeliac disease. In detecting classic coeliac disease, villous tip analysis also reached a higher sensitivity than CD3+ and gammadelta+ cells. CONCLUSIONS: Villous tip analysis seems to distinguish early coeliac from non-specific changes, thus providing a valuable tool in routine practice, especially when borderline findings are involved. Its value appears to be similar to counting of gammadelta+ cells, which, however, requires frozen biopsy samples.

Key concepts: Coeliac disease, Villous atrophy, Intraepithelial lymphocyte, Pathology, Medicine, Biopsy, CD3, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Villous tip intraepithelial lymphocytes as markers of early‐stage coeliac disease — Research Paper | ScholarLens