1961The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Critique of the Reverberant Room Method of Measuring Air-Borne Sound Transmission Loss

T. Mariner

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Some obscure but important philosophical difficulties with the standard method of measuring transmission loss by the reverberant room method have led to reexamination of the basic concepts. An equation is derived relating transmission loss to the “total loss area” H2 of the receiving room. H2 is found to be measurable within a negligibly small uncertainty, using familiar sound-decay techniques, providing that T2/T1, the ratio of “natural” reverberation times of the receiving and source rooms is properly adjusted. It is shown that the equations commonly used in the existing standard method require knowledge of A2, the total absorption of the receiving room, implicitly excluding transmission through the panel. A2 is not generally measurable without prior knowledge of the transmission loss of the test panel. These and other considerations result in the proposal of a new procedure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Some obscure but important philosophical difficulties with the standard method of measuring transmission loss by the reverberant room method have led to reexamination of the basic concepts. An equation is derived relating transmission loss to the “total loss area” H2 of the receiving room. H2 is found to be measurable within a negligibly small uncertainty, using familiar sound-decay techniques, providing that T2/T1, the ratio of “natural” reverberation times of the receiving and source rooms is properly adjusted. It is shown that the equations commonly used in the existing standard method require knowledge of A2, the total absorption of the receiving room, implicitly excluding transmission through the panel. A2 is not generally measurable without prior knowledge of the transmission loss of the test panel. These and other considerations result in the proposal of a new procedure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Some obscure but important philosophical difficulties with the standard method of measuring transmission loss by the reverberant room method have led to reexamination of the basic concepts. An equation is derived relating transmission loss to the “total loss area” H2 of the receiving room. H2 is found to be measurable within a negligibly small uncertainty, using familiar sound-decay techniques, providing that T2/T1, the ratio of “natural” reverberation times of the receiving and source rooms is properly adjusted. It is shown that the equations commonly used in the existing standard method require knowledge of A2, the total absorption of the receiving room, implicitly excluding transmission through the panel. A2 is not generally measurable without prior knowledge of the transmission loss of the test panel. These and other considerations result in the proposal of a new procedure.

Key concepts: Reverberation, Sound transmission class, Transmission loss, Reverberation room, Acoustics, Transmission (telecommunications), Room acoustics, Absorption (acoustics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Critique of the Reverberant Room Method of Measuring Air-Borne Sound Transmission Loss — Research Paper | ScholarLens