Different forms of the plasma energy conservation equation
Thomas Stringer
Abstract
Thomas Stringer
Abstract
The plasma energy flux is frequently equated to the kinetic energy flux. However, the periodic exchange between kinetic and potential energy in the gyratory motion produces a spurious contribution, which is balanced by a potential energy flux. The total energy flux is more meaningful. This is equivalent to the guiding-centre energy flux. The convective part of this is (3/2) Gamma T, not (5/2) Gamma T as for the kinetic energy flux.
OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The plasma energy flux is frequently equated to the kinetic energy flux. However, the periodic exchange between kinetic and potential energy in the gyratory motion produces a spurious contribution, which is balanced by a potential energy flux. The total energy flux is more meaningful. This is equivalent to the guiding-centre energy flux. The convective part of this is (3/2) Gamma T, not (5/2) Gamma T as for the kinetic energy flux.
Key concepts: Kinetic energy, Energy flux, Flux (metallurgy), Physics, Plasma, Energy (signal processing), Spurious relationship, Energy conservation