1992Journal of AircraftRequires access

Assessment of microburst models for downdraft estimation

Dan D. Vicroy

Open publisher page 144 citations

Abstract

The effectiveness of three microburst models in estimating the downdraft from horizontal velocity measurements is assessed. The development of the models and their characteristics are discussed. The simplest model, a linear one, works well for altitudes below 200 m and near the microburst core. A ring-vortex model and an empirical model give the best overall results. The former is the most complex, requiring four variables to define it. The empirical model uses three variables.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effectiveness of three microburst models in estimating the downdraft from horizontal velocity measurements is assessed. The development of the models and their characteristics are discussed. The simplest model, a linear one, works well for altitudes below 200 m and near the microburst core. A ring-vortex model and an empirical model give the best overall results. The former is the most complex, requiring four variables to define it. The empirical model uses three variables.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 144 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effectiveness of three microburst models in estimating the downdraft from horizontal velocity measurements is assessed. The development of the models and their characteristics are discussed. The simplest model, a linear one, works well for altitudes below 200 m and near the microburst core. A ring-vortex model and an empirical model give the best overall results. The former is the most complex, requiring four variables to define it. The empirical model uses three variables.

Key concepts: Microburst, Meteorology, Mathematics, Physics, Wind shear, Wind speed

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of microburst models for downdraft estimation — Research Paper | ScholarLens