Towards a safety case for runtime risk and uncertainty management in safety-critical systems
Ralph Eastwood, Einar Landre, Rob Alexander, T.P. Kelly
Abstract
Ralph Eastwood, Einar Landre, Rob Alexander, T.P. Kelly
Abstract
Many safety-critical systems have a human-in-the-loop for some part of their operation, and rely on the higher cognitive abilities of the human operator for fault diagnosis and risk-management decision-making. Although these operators are often experts on the processes being controlled, they still sometimes misjudge situations or make poor decisions. There is thus potential for Safety Decision Support Systems (SDSS) to help operators, building on past successes with Clinical Decision Support Systems in the health care industry. Such SDSS could help operators more accurately assess the system's state along with any associated risk and uncertainty. However, such a system supporting a safety critical operation inevitably attracts its own safety assurance obligations. This paper will outline those challenges and suggest an initial safety case architecture for SDSS.
OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Many safety-critical systems have a human-in-the-loop for some part of their operation, and rely on the higher cognitive abilities of the human operator for fault diagnosis and risk-management decision-making. Although these operators are often experts on the processes being controlled, they still sometimes misjudge situations or make poor decisions. There is thus potential for Safety Decision Support Systems (SDSS) to help operators, building on past successes with Clinical Decision Support Systems in the health care industry. Such SDSS could help operators more accurately assess the system's state along with any associated risk and uncertainty. However, such a system supporting a safety critical operation inevitably attracts its own safety assurance obligations. This paper will outline those challenges and suggest an initial safety case architecture for SDSS.
Key concepts: Safety assurance, Risk analysis (engineering), Life-critical system, System safety, Decision support system, Computer science, Risk management, Operator (biology)