2009•The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

The role of formant positions and micro-modulations in blending and partial masking of musical instruments.

Christoph W. Reuter

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

In experiments about the distinction of instruments playing in unison, it has been shown that timbres with overlapping formant areas are blending homogeneously whereas timbres with different formant areas are distinguishable very well (Reuter, 1996). On the other hand timbre separation is enhanced by micro-modulations and vibratos [e.g., McAdams (1982); Reuter (2007)]. The aim of this contribution is to find out to what extent timbre separation is influenced by different micro-modulations/vibratos versus different formant positions. 30 subjects listened to scale fragments of simultaneous playing instruments with equivalent formant areas and with different formant areas, with and without starting/ending transients, and with and without vibratos/micro-modulations. They had to answer the following question: Do you hear one sole instrument (or two of the same instruments) or do you hear two different instruments? In almost all cases featuring equivalent formant areas most of the subjects perceived one blending timbre, independent of the presence of vibratos/micro-modulations and transients. In the presence of vibratos/micro-modulations, differing formant areas predominantly led to the perception of two different timbres. Without vibratos/micro-modulations, timbre separation is much worse. These observations are explainable by a psycho-acoustical model of timbre perception.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In experiments about the distinction of instruments playing in unison, it has been shown that timbres with overlapping formant areas are blending homogeneously whereas timbres with different formant areas are distinguishable very well (Reuter, 1996). On the other hand timbre separation is enhanced by micro-modulations and vibratos [e.g., McAdams (1982); Reuter (2007)]. The aim of this contribution is to find out to what extent timbre separation is influenced by different micro-modulations/vibratos versus different formant positions. 30 subjects listened to scale fragments of simultaneous playing instruments with equivalent formant areas and with different formant areas, with and without starting/ending transients, and with and without vibratos/micro-modulations. They had to answer the following question: Do you hear one sole instrument (or two of the same instruments) or do you hear two different instruments? In almost all cases featuring equivalent formant areas most of the subjects perceived one blending timbre, independent of the presence of vibratos/micro-modulations and transients. In the presence of vibratos/micro-modulations, differing formant areas predominantly led to the perception of two different timbres. Without vibratos/micro-modulations, timbre separation is much worse. These observations are explainable by a psycho-acoustical model of timbre perception.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In experiments about the distinction of instruments playing in unison, it has been shown that timbres with overlapping formant areas are blending homogeneously whereas timbres with different formant areas are distinguishable very well (Reuter, 1996). On the other hand timbre separation is enhanced by micro-modulations and vibratos [e.g., McAdams (1982); Reuter (2007)]. The aim of this contribution is to find out to what extent timbre separation is influenced by different micro-modulations/vibratos versus different formant positions. 30 subjects listened to scale fragments of simultaneous playing instruments with equivalent formant areas and with different formant areas, with and without starting/ending transients, and with and without vibratos/micro-modulations. They had to answer the following question: Do you hear one sole instrument (or two of the same instruments) or do you hear two different instruments? In almost all cases featuring equivalent formant areas most of the subjects perceived one blending timbre, independent of the presence of vibratos/micro-modulations and transients. In the presence of vibratos/micro-modulations, differing formant areas predominantly led to the perception of two different timbres. Without vibratos/micro-modulations, timbre separation is much worse. These observations are explainable by a psycho-acoustical model of timbre perception.

Key concepts: Formant, Timbre, Acoustics, Unison, Masking (illustration), Perception, Computer science, Speech recognition

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The role of formant positions and micro-modulations in blending and partial masking of musical instruments. — Research Paper | ScholarLens