1988AnaesthesiaOpen access

Comparison between propofol and midazolam as sedative agents for surgery under regional anaesthesia

L. Fanard, A. Van Steenberge, X. Demeire, F. van der Puyl

Open full text 40 citations

Abstract

Propofol (25 patients) or midazolam (25 patients) was used to provide sedation in patients who underwent abdominal or orthopaedic surgery under epidural anaesthesia after intravenous premedication with droperidol 1 mg and fentanyl 20 micrograms. The quality of sedation whilst the block was performed, was assessed as good in 19 patients after propofol 1.49 mg/kg but six patients exhibited uncontrolled movement. Good sedation was provided in 22 patients after midazolam 3 mg. A mean infusion rate of propofol of 1.74 mg/kg/hour resulted in easily controllable sedation during the procedure. Eleven patients given midazolam required no further sedation but a mean of 5.79 mg was needed in the remaining 14 patients; the dose was unpredictable in individual patients. Recovery was significantly more rapid in the propofol group.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Propofol (25 patients) or midazolam (25 patients) was used to provide sedation in patients who underwent abdominal or orthopaedic surgery under epidural anaesthesia after intravenous premedication with droperidol 1 mg and fentanyl 20 micrograms. The quality of sedation whilst the block was performed, was assessed as good in 19 patients after propofol 1.49 mg/kg but six patients exhibited uncontrolled movement. Good sedation was provided in 22 patients after midazolam 3 mg. A mean infusion rate of propofol of 1.74 mg/kg/hour resulted in easily controllable sedation during the procedure. Eleven patients given midazolam required no further sedation but a mean of 5.79 mg was needed in the remaining 14 patients; the dose was unpredictable in individual patients. Recovery was significantly more rapid in the propofol group.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 40 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Propofol (25 patients) or midazolam (25 patients) was used to provide sedation in patients who underwent abdominal or orthopaedic surgery under epidural anaesthesia after intravenous premedication with droperidol 1 mg and fentanyl 20 micrograms. The quality of sedation whilst the block was performed, was assessed as good in 19 patients after propofol 1.49 mg/kg but six patients exhibited uncontrolled movement. Good sedation was provided in 22 patients after midazolam 3 mg. A mean infusion rate of propofol of 1.74 mg/kg/hour resulted in easily controllable sedation during the procedure. Eleven patients given midazolam required no further sedation but a mean of 5.79 mg was needed in the remaining 14 patients; the dose was unpredictable in individual patients. Recovery was significantly more rapid in the propofol group.

Key concepts: Medicine, Midazolam, Propofol, Sedation, Anesthesia, Premedication, Fentanyl, Sedative

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison between propofol and midazolam as sedative agents for surgery under regional anaesthesia — Research Paper | ScholarLens