The Juvenile, the Court, or the Community: Whose Best Interests Are Currently Being Promoted in Juvenile Court?
Joseph B. Sanborn
Abstract
Joseph B. Sanborn
Abstract
Originally, juvenile courts were designed to promote only the best interests of the child. Developments within the last three decades, however, have suggested that there are other interests represented in juvenile court proceedings. In this study, one hundred juvenile court workers (judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, probation officers) from three juvenile courts (urban, suburban, rural) were interviewed to determine the extent to which the child’s interests are promoted in the contemporary juvenile court. The data suggest that a number of other interests currently rival the youth’s for primacy in decisions reached in juvenile court.
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Originally, juvenile courts were designed to promote only the best interests of the child. Developments within the last three decades, however, have suggested that there are other interests represented in juvenile court proceedings. In this study, one hundred juvenile court workers (judges, prosecutors, defense counsel, probation officers) from three juvenile courts (urban, suburban, rural) were interviewed to determine the extent to which the child’s interests are promoted in the contemporary juvenile court. The data suggest that a number of other interests currently rival the youth’s for primacy in decisions reached in juvenile court.
Key concepts: Juvenile, Juvenile court, Political science, Juvenile delinquency, Law, Family court, Criminology, Psychology